Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Neelam Prints Vs. Deputy Supdt., Central Excise and ors.

Decided On : Jul-27-1982

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Rule 8(1, Rule 8, Rule 8, P-5 and P-6, Rule 10, Rule 8, Rule 8

ORG: I.S. Tiwana, the Central Excise Rules, the Central Excises, MINISTRY OF FINANCE(Department, Revenue)NOTIFICATION Central ExcisesNew Delhi, the State of Pondicherry, Central Government, the Central Excises, Table, the Central Government, Central Government, the Government of India, the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue, the Assistant Collector, the Assistant Collector, the Central Excise Rules, the Excise Department, Indian Union, the Central Excise Collectorate, Indian Union, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Supreme Court, The Cannanora Spinning, Weaving Mills Ltd., The Collector of Customs, Cochin and Ors., the Supreme Court

NORP: J.1, han

DATE: the year 1963, April 24, 1962, 1944, 1944, the 24th April, 1962, 531.-In, 1944, 1944, 1944, March 7, 1964, the 7th March, 1964, 1944, the 24th April, 1962, March 8, 1964, 1964, August 14, 1969, April 26, 1972, April 24, 1962, 1970, 1950

GPE: India, Processed, New Delhi, Processed, Baroda, A.I.R., S.C.

CARDINAL: 22, 1, 2, 3, 2, 3)________________________________________________________________________________1, 3.5, 51/62, 388.-In, 51/62, 64/64, 2, 1, 53,179.28, 2, 4., 13, 7, 7, 24-4-1962

PERSON: exempted(1, Metre, B.N. BANNERJI, Amritsar, Brar

PRODUCT: P-3, P-3, P-3, P-3, P-3, P-3, P-3, P-3, P-3, P-3

ORDINAL: first, first, firstly, secondly

WORK_OF_ART: the Excise Collectorate at

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //