Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Vardhman Polytex Ltd.

Decided On : May-22-2006

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 80HHC, Section 143(1)(a, the IT Act, Section 143(3, Section 143(3, Section 80HHC of the Act, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC of the Act, Section 80HHC, Section 28, the Customs Act, the Customs Act, Section 28;(baa, Section 28, Section 80HHC of the Act, Section 80HHC of the Act, Section 80HHC of the Act, the Customs Act, Section 28, Section 80HHC of the Act, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC of the Act, Section 80HHC of the Act, Section 80HHC of the Act, Section 80HHC of the Act, the Explanation to Section 80HHC, the Explanation to Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC(1, Section 80HHC(1, Section 80HHC(3)(a

CARDINAL: 1, 2, two, 2000]245ITR769(Bom, 2002]256ITR625(Cal, 2004]265ITR35(Ker, 2005]272ITR652(Mad, 2004]268ITR232(KAR, 2005]275ITR319(Mad, 2005]272ITR118(MP, 2006]281ITR425(Mad, 1, 2, 2, 52, 52, 1962):Provided, 1, two, 1979]3SCR12, two, one, 10, two, two, two, two, two, two, two, 192, 70, 271, 159, 1983]143ITR473(Guj, 115, one, one, 17, six

ORDINAL: 16th, secondly

DATE: Nov., 2004, 1995-96, the assessment year, 28th Nov., 1995, 1961, 8th Feb., 1996, 16th March, 1998, 1994-95, 1962, 1962, year, the 1st day of April, 1991, 1962, year, 1st day of April, 1991, 1979]2SCR148, 2004, 2004, 42

PERSON: Chandigarh, N.L. Sharda, Shri Akshay Bhan, N.L. Sharda, Akshay Bhan, Madras, Karnataka, K. Rajendranathan Nair, D.P. Agrawal, S. Mohan Lal v. R. Kondiah, Delhi High Court, Counsel

ORG: Tribunal, the Hon'ble Tribunal, AO, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Tribunal, Calcutta, IFB Agro Industries Ltd., CIT, Tribunal, Tribunal, IFB Agro Industries Ltd., CIT .9, Departmental Representative, IFB Agro Industries Ltd., CIT, AO, the Tribunal (Special Bench, Madhya Pradesh High Courts, CIT, Sudarshan Chemicals Industries Ltd., CIT, Chloride India Ltd., CIT, CIT, Sundaram Fasteners Ltd., CIT, Bharat Earth Movers Ltd., CIT, Wheels India Ltd., CIT, Sundaram Clayton Ltd., Explns, Counsel for the Revenue, the Supreme Court of India, the Board of Muslim Wakfs, Radha Kishan & Ors, Wheels India Ltd.'s, Madras High Court, Sudarshan Chemicals Industries Ltd., P&L, CIT, S.A.E. Head Office, Monthly Paid Employees Welfare Trust, CTR, another High Court, Court, Bench, Bench, another High Court, CIT, Sarabhai Sons Ltd., the Gujarat High Court, the Bombay High Court, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Steel Authority of India v. Collector of Customs, SC, the Supreme Court of India, the Bombay Customs House, Customs, State, State, Customs House, Customs

GPE: Counsel, Bombay, Calcutta, Kerala, India, India, India, India, India, India, India;7, India, India, India, India, India, Delhi, India

WORK_OF_ART: business.-(1

NORP: Indian

MONEY: ninety per cent, ninety per cent

QUANTITY: one Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //