The State Vs. Indian Aluminium Cable Ltd.

Decided On : Nov-05-1973

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 5(2)(a)(iv, the State Act, Section 8(2A, the Central Act, Section 20(1, the State Act, Section 9(3, the Central Act, Section 22, the State Act, Section 8(2A, Section 5(2)(a)(iv, Section 8(2A, Section 5(2)(a)(iv, Section 5(2)(a)(iv, the State Act, the Indian Electricity Act, Section 6, the State Act, the Central Act, Section 6, Section 8(2A, Section 6, the State Act, Section 5(2)(a)(iv, the State Act, Section 8(2A, Section 6, Section 8(2A, the Central Act, Section 8(2A, the Central Act, Section 8(2A, the Central Act, Section 8(2A, the Central Act, Section 5, the Punjab Act, Section 8(2A, Section 8, the Central Act, the Indian Electricity Act, Section 8(2A, Section 6, the State Act, Section 6, the State Act whereas Section 5, Section 8(2A, the Central Act, Section 6, Section 5, Section 6, Section 5, Section 8(2A, the Central Act, Section 6, the State Act, Section 5 of the State Act, Section 8(2A, the Central Act, Section 5(2)(a)(iv, the State Act, the Indian Electricity Act, Section 8(2A, the Central Act, Section 8 of the Act, Section 5(2)(a)(iv, the State Act, Section 5(2)(a)(iv, Section 8(1, Section 8(2A, the State Act, Section 8(2A, Section 8(2A, the Central Act, Section 5(2)(a)(iv, the State Act, Section 8(2A, the Central Act

ORG: D.K. Mahajan, Sales Tax References Nos, M/s. R.N. Ghanekar and Company, Sales Tax Reference No, Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking, Sales Tax Reference No, State, the Assessing Authority, the Assessing Authority, The Assessing Authority, the Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking, the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Sales Tax Tribunal, The Sales Tax Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Sales Tax Reference No, M/s. Indian Aluminium Cable Ltd., State, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, Sales Tax Reference No, Tribunal, M/s. R.N. Ghanekar and Co., Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, The State Government, Schedule B, State, State, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Schedule B, Halwais, Halwais, Schedule B of, State, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Sales Tax, State, Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking, State, State, State, Sales Tax, Kapoor Dori Niwar and Co., Bench, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Kapoor Dori Niwar and Co., the High Court, State, State, Sub-Section, Co., Bench, Central, State, Tribunal

NORP: J.1, inter-State, inter-State

CARDINAL: 11 and 12, 12, 11, 11, 12, 12, two, 12, 2, 11, 3, 1956.5, 1, 2A, 1A, 1, 2, lower than, Two, 1, 2, One, 1968, 22, 152, 2A, 9, 22, 152, 22, 152, 2A, 2A, 2A, two, 13, 433, 13, 838, 276.19

DATE: 1969, year 1962-63, 1969, 1963-64, 1969, 1969, 7th July, 1965, 28th October, 1965, 1948, 26th March, 1969, 1969, the year 1962-63, 1956, 1948, 1969, 1956, 1948, 1948, 1910, less than thirty days', 1910, 1910, 1968J, 1968J, the 1st April, 1959, the 1st April, 1959, 1962, 1962, 1973

GPE: Faridabad, Faridabad, Faridabad, Haryana, Gurgaon, Faridabad, Delhi, Faridabad, Haryana, Madhya Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Kerala

WORK_OF_ART: S.T. Reference No., S.T. Reference No. 11 of 1969

PERSON: Haryana, Schedule, Chetan Dass Dewan, Ved Vyas, Madhya Pradesh, M.A. Abbas, Krishna Iyer v. State, Ved Vyas, Ved Vyas

ORDINAL: first, second, first, second

MONEY: three per cent

TIME: under this Act