Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Satnam Transport Co. (P.) Ltd.

Decided On : Apr-19-1972

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 23(3, Section 10 of 1922 Act, Section 155, Section 155 of the 1961 Act, Section 155, Section 155 of the 1961, Section 33, Section 617, the Companies Act, Section 33, Section 34, Section 154, Section 33, Section 155, Section 155, Section 297 of the 1961 Act, Section 297 of the, Section 155 of the 1961 Act, Section 155 of the 1961 Act, Section 155(5, Section 35, Section 34, Section 34, Section 5(7A, the Patiala Act, Section 154, Section 23(3, Section 34(1, Section 154, Section 35, Section 154, Section 35, Section 35, Section 35, Section 34, Section 154, Section 35, Section 154, Section 155, Section 155, Section 35(5, Section 35(5, Section 297(2)(a, Section 297(2)(a, Section 297(2)(a

PERSON: Rajendra Nath Mittal, Act.4, L. Hazari Mal Kuthiala v. Income-tax Officer, Ambala Cantt, Ambala, Ambala, Vajirshet v. Dhondu Navlapa, G. S. Venkatesan, Hazari Mal Kuthiala's, Bench, Jhajharia, Mal Kuthiala's, C. Rm, Adaikkappa Chettiar, S. Sankappa v. Income-tax Officer, Bangalore, Awasthy, therein.10

CARDINAL: 41, 9,187, 2, 2, 5, 5, 5, 3, 4, 3, 3, 5, 2, 2, 5, 5, 2, 41, 15, 1961, 5(7A, 5(7A, 5, 29, 717, 267, 1887, 74, 6, 78, 78, 79, 80, 82, 1968, 68, 760, 1968, 2, 674

DATE: 1971, the assessment year 1959-60, 1922, eight years, 1961, March 7, 1968, June 23, 1960, the assessment year 1959-60, 1959-60, the 31st December, 1957, year, 1922, the expiry of eight years, the end of the previous year, 1956, the eight years, previous year, four years, the previous year, 1922, 31st December, 1957, year, 1922, 1922, December 31, 1957, 8 years, the end of the previous year, previous year, year, that year, December 31, 1957, 1961, 1961, 1922, November 4, 1953, 1955, 2001, the accounting year 1945-46, 2001, year 1946-47, 1950, 1956, 1956, 1969, 1970, 1961, 1922, 1922, 1970, 1971, 1971, 1971, 1922, March 7, 1968

NORP: Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian

ORG: Appellate, Appellate, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, Appellate, Appellate, Central, Ambala, The Supreme Court, Explanation, Bidi Supply Co. v. Union of India, the Supreme Court, P.M. Bharucha & Co., Bidyut Prova Raha v. Income-tax Officer, the Calcutta High Court, Indra Co. Ltd, this High Court, Hargopal Bhalla & Sons, Bench, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, R.S. Narula

GPE: India, India, S.C., S.C., Bhavnagar, Giridharilal, Hazari, Vr, Digboi, S.C., Hargopal

PRODUCT: 1 S.C.R.

FAC: the Gujarat High Court

LOC: Central Circle

WORK_OF_ART: Mahajan and Tuli JJ

EVENT: the 1922 Act, the 1961 Act, the 1961 Act