Pawan Kumar Garg Vs. Cit

Decided On : Jul-30-2007

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 260A, Section 5, Section 260A of the Act, Section 54F, Section 54F, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(2, Section 54F, Section 54F, Section 54F, Section 271(1)(c, Section 54F, Section 54F, Section 54F, Section 54F, Section 54F, Section 260A(1, Section 5, the Limitation Act

PERSON: M.M. Kumar, J.1, Chandigarh Bench, I. Whether, V. Whether, Ludhiana, Kashmira Singh, Ludhiana, Question Nos

DATE: 24.5.2006, 1998-99, 294 days, three years, the year, three years, 11.10.1998, 1,64,086/-which, 1021, the month of February, 2001, 18.10.1993, the month of February, 2001, three years, 11.10.1998, 18.10.1993, a period of, three years, three years, the financial year 2000-01, 18.10.1993, a period of, three years, 1963

ORG: the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ITA No, the CBDT Circular, CBDT, AO, ITAT, the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, XEN, the Executive Engineer, AC Sheet, Assessing, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Income Tax, the Board No, the Executive Engineer, Punjab Urban Development Authority, Tribunal, the Tribunal the assessee, Punjab Urban Development Authority, Tribunal, AC, Tribunal, Tribunal, Board

CARDINAL: 262, 27.9.1999, 28.9.1999, 2900, two, two, 667, two, 4., 22.4.1997, 22.4.2000, 667, two, 5, 22.4.1997, 22.4.2000, only two, less than 150, 22.4.2000, two, less than 150, 22.4.2000, 667, 22.4.1997, two

NORP: ITAT, ITAT, ITAT

GPE: A.O., A.O., A.O.which, PUDA, Ld, Ld, dispute.3, Counsel

EVENT: the A.O. II

ORDINAL: first