Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Schradar-scovtll Duncan Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer
Decided On : Feb-05-1986
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
LAW: Section 37(4, Section 37, Section 37(4, Section 37, the Finance Act, Section 37, Section 37(4, Section 37(4, Section 30, Section 37(4, Section 37(1, Shri Doshi.5, Section 37, the Finance Act, Section 37(3, Section 37(4, Section 37(4, Section 37(3, Section 37(3, Section 37, the Finance Act, Section 37(4, Section 37, Section 37, Section 37(3, Section 37(3, Section 37(3, Section 37(4, Section 37, Section 37(4, Section 37(3, Section 37(3, Section 37, Section 37, Section 37(4, Section 37(4, Section 37(4, Section 37(4, Section 40(c)(i, Section 40(c, Section 40(c)(i, Section 40A(5, Section 40(c, Rule 5
CARDINAL: 1, two, two, 4, three, two, two, two, 5, two, 18 to 34, 23, 5, 1-4-1979, 123, 136, 361, 5, 1-4-1979, two, 37(3, 5, about 7, 36,471.6, 1-4-1979, 1-4-1979, 5, 1, 153, 197, 113, one, three, three, 4, three, two, two, two, 5, 1-4-1979, 5, 5, 5, 1-4-1979, 1-4-1979, 1-4-1979, 5, 5, 4, two, 4, 4, 624, 3, 4, three, two, 4, 85,501, 2, 1, 22, 8), 2-8-1983, 6,000, 5,400, 11,400, 9, 15, 7, 8,000, 23,717, 1,47,041, 80,000, 80,000, 8,000, 23,717, 8,000, 1, two, 38, two
ORG: ITO, the Commissioner (Appeals, Altamount Road, ITO, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, Calcutta, Tribunal, Tribunal, CIT, Aruna Sugars Ltd., sec, Haryana High Court, Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd., CIT, Legislature, Bhavana Chemicals Ltd., Tribunal, ITO, ITO, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, theKarnataka High Court, N.G.E.F. Ltd., CIT, Haryana High Court, the Bombay High Court, CIT, Tribunal, Karnataka High Court, Haryana High Court, the High Court, Tribunal, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Tribunal, Aruna Sugars Ltd., The High Court, Haryana High Court, Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd., N.G.E.F. Ltd., The Karnataka High Court, the Bombay High Court, Haryana High Courts, Lordships, the High Courts, Haryana High Courts', the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Bench, ITO, Sapt Textiles Products India Ltd., Homi Mehta &, Sons (P.) Ltd., the Commissioner (Appeals, ITO, The Commissioner (Appeals, ITO, Tribunal, Tribunal, IAC v. Mercantile Bank Ltd., ITO, Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, ITO, The Commissioner (Appeals, ITO, the Tribunal for the earlier year, Tribunal, ITO, ITO, the Commissioner (Appeals, ITO, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal
DATE: the assessment year 1978-79, 1961, 1,24,788, the previous year, 1,29,788, 1976-77, 1977-78, this year, years 1975-76, 1977-78, the earlier years, 1983, 1980, 1982, the assessment year 1978-79, 1985, the assessment year 1979-80, the earlier years, this year, the earlier years, prior years, the assessment years 1979-80, 1985, 1978, the assessment year 1978-79, the assessment year 1978-79.10, 1962, the previous year, the assessment year 1978-79, 1982, years 1975-76, 1737, 1983, 1961, 10, 1984, the previous year, 2,37,131, years 1975-76, 1977-78, This year, the preceding year, 34
ORDINAL: first, second, second, first, second, second, second, second, first
GPE: Bombay, New Delhi, Delhi, Bombay, Delhi, Bombay, New Delhi, Bombay, Dandeli, the State of Karnataka, Bombay, Baroda, assessee, Delhi, Altamount Road, Bombay, assessee, Bombay, assessee, assessee
FAC: Vasant Vihar, Prithviraj Road, Vasant Vihar, Prithviraj Road
PERSON: Usha Kiran', Shri Doshi, Shri Doshi, Alloys Pvt, Shri B.C. Mehta, Kothari {Madras, K.K. Tuli, Punjab, Shri Tuli, Godavaridevi Saraf, Punjab, Kothari, Godavaridevi Saraf, Punjab, Lordships, Punjab, Shri Jal Dastur, Gautam Doshi, Shri Doshi, Shri Tuli, Shri Doshi, Schedule, Doshi, Schedule
NORP: Punjab, Punjab, Rules, Rules
PRODUCT: Shri B.V. Jhaveri
LOC: Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras
MONEY: 10 per cent, 10 per cent, 10 per cent, 10 per cent