Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Hari NaraIn and ors. Vs. Subhash Chander and ors.

Decided On : Feb-08-1985

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: the Succession Act, the Limitation Act, the Telegraph Act, S. 51, the Electricity Act, Article 137, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Telegraph Act, the Succession Act, the Limitation Act, Section 4, Section 3

PERSON: I.S. Tiwana, Kumar Chakravarty, Sukhaharan Chakravarty, Ambala, Piara Lal, Subhash Chander, Piara Lal, Shri Liberhan, T. P. Kunhaliumma, Bench, Art, Setia, Schedule, Kaushalya Rani, Gopal Singh, Gram Panchayat, Schedule, Schedule

DATE: J. 1, 4th November, 1969, 25th July, 1962, 12th March, 1974, 4th November, 1969, 12th March, 1974, 4th of November, 1969, February, 1974, 12th March, 1974, 1963, a period of, 3 years, 28th March, 1970, 1977, 1885, 1910, 1963, 1963, 1972, 36, Para 22, three years, the same period i.e., 3 years, 28th March, 1970, 27th March, 1973, 12th March, 1974, 3 years

GPE: Aswini, question:--Hari Narain, Art, Art, Act.3

ORG: the Court of the District Judge, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Kerala State Electricity Board, Lordships, Limitation Act, Athani Municipal Council, AIR 1969, Court, Act, AIR 1964 SC 260, AIR, S. 2, The Law Commission

CARDINAL: 137, 282, 137, 10, 16(5, two, 137, 137, four, 4 to 24, 4 to 24, 137

ORDINAL: Firstly, secondly

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //