Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Rajesh Chawla Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Decided On : May-22-2006

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 271(1)(c, the IT Act, Section 271(1)(c).2, Section 131(a, Section 148, Section 143(3, Section 147 of the Act, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, the IT Act, Section 271(1)(c, Section 139(5, Section 139(5, Section 271(1, Section 271(4A, Section 271(1)(c).18.1, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(4A, Section 271(1)(c, the IT Act, the IT Act, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, the IT Act, Section 271(1)(c).20, Section 148, the IT Act, Section 271(1)(c, the IT Act, Section 271(1)(c, the IT Act, Section 271(1)(c

ORG: ORDER1, the Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench ', SMC, Tribunal, Tribunal, Department, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, ADI, ADI, Rajneesh, Rajeev, ADI, Tribunal, M/s Baldev Electricals, ADI, Asstt, CIT, AO, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, CIT, CIT, CIT v., Amjad AM Nazir AH v., CIT, CIT, Tribunal, Tribunal, CIT, Ayyasami Nadar & Bros., CIT, CIT Taxation, CST, AO, CIT, CIT v., Madras High Court, the IT Department, Department, CIT, Ganga Parsad, CIT, CIT, CIT, ITR, Nav Nirman Co., CIT, Union Engineering Co., CIT 0065/1979, CIT, Badshah Prasad, CIT, P.T. Antony & Sons, Madras High Court, CIT v., income.19.2 As per Expln, AO, Hon'ble Supreme Court, CIT, Lordships of Supreme Court, Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court, the High Court, High Court, CIT, the Tribunal:The assessee, AO, AO, Department, Tribunal, AO, Tribunal, Tribunal, AO, Department, Tribunal, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, CIT, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, ITO, P.O. Joseph & Bros., CIT, CTR, CIT, Sudharshan Silks & Sarees

PERSON: ITA Nos, Surrender, income.4, Rajesh, Ludhiana, Rajesh Chawla, Rajiv Chawla, Ludhiana, Rajesh Chawla, Rajiv Chawla, Rajesh Chawla, Rajiv Chawla, Rajiv Chawla, Shadi Lal Sugar, Sajjan Singh Malik, Addl, Radhey Shyam, Mahavir Metal Works, Palla, Khurza, Vadilal Ichhachand, Mal v., Delhi Automobiles, Ram Hargan Dass, Lordships, Sulemanji Ganibhai v., Mohd, Ibrahim Azimullah, Haji P. Mohammad, Kumar Jagadish, Chandra Sinha v., Radhey Shyam, Lordships, Chandra Mittal, Chandra Mittal, Shadi Lal, Chandra Mittal, Anr

CARDINAL: 107, 108, 109, 2, 3, 1, 1, 1987]168ITR705(SC, 1977]110ITR602(Mad, 1977]110ITR419(All, 1980]123ITR125(All, one, 17, 23, 17, 1957]32ITR569(Bom, 1956]30ITR565(Mad, 424, 84, 271, 1988]171ITR390(All, 1977]110ITR602(Mad, 1980]123ITR349(All, 1980]121ITR373(MP, 1981]131ITR680(All, 132, 623, 1982]137ITR722(Cal, 1984]148ITR703(MP, 1980]122ITR719(Ker, 1980]123ITR125(All, 1981]127ITR601(Patna, 1985]151ITR34(Ker, 273A, One, 2001]251ITR9(SC, 2000]241ITR124(MP, 1 to Section 271, 1 to Section 271(1)(c, 2001]251ITR9(SC, 26, 26, 158, 104, 240, 818, 2002]253ITR145(KAR

DATE: 2004, 1994-95, 1961, May, 1996, 4th June, 1996, 4th June, 1996, 10th June, 1996, 14th June, 1996, 14th June, 1996, 20th June, 1996, 20th June, 1996, 18th June, 1996, Oct., 1996, 18, 1981, 2005, 2000, 2000

GPE: Expln, Act.3, Subramania, assessee, Subramania, Subramania, assessee, Expln, Expln

ORDINAL: 24th, 16th, first, first

MONEY: 100 per cent

FAC: Padam Kumar Garg v.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //