Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Gobind Ram

Decided On : May-06-1996

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 269L, Circular, Chapter XX-A of the Income-tax Act, Section 269C, Chapter XX-C, Chapter XX, Section 269C, Section 269D, Chapter XX-C, the Finance Act, Chapter XX-A, Section 269C, Section 269D, Chapter XX-A, Section 269D, Section 269D', Section 269D, the Finance Act, Chapter XX

CARDINAL: 1, 4, 5, 1982.2, 35,000, about 5,000, ten, about 10, 39,257, 30, 60,000, 1, more than 15, 269D, 75,000, 39,257, 35,000, 1986]159ITR105(Cal, 455, 5, 5, 6, 1986.7, 5, 5, 1, 5

DATE: September 10, 1981, April 24, 1973, 1961, December 27, 1973, annual, May 16, 1986, May 16, 1986, 1961, 1986, 1961, the 30th day of September, 1986, 1961, April 1, 1986, September 30, 1986, 1986, October 1, 1986, September 30, April 1, 1986, 1980, February 20, 1996--CIT v. Export India Corporation, 1986

PERSON: Gobind Ram, Damodar Dass, Shri Hari Shanker, Babu Lal, Narnaul, Shri Moti Lal Aggarwal, Narnaul, Rohtak, Rohtak, Shri Hari Ram, Shri Laxmi Narain Gupta, Bill, Bill, Chapter XX-A

ORG: Sections 269C, Appellate Tribunal, Appellate, Appellate Tribunal, Department, the Central Government, Board, Board, the Tribunal/High Court.8, Board, Finance, House, Board, the Tribunal/High Court, Board

GPE: New Delhi

MONEY: 15 per cent

PRODUCT: Section 269RR

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //