Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Gobind Ram
Decided On : May-06-1996
Court : Punjab and Haryana
LAW: Section 269L, Circular, Chapter XX-A of the Income-tax Act, Section 269C, Chapter XX-C, Chapter XX, Section 269C, Section 269D, Chapter XX-C, the Finance Act, Chapter XX-A, Section 269C, Section 269D, Chapter XX-A, Section 269D, Section 269D', Section 269D, the Finance Act, Chapter XX
CARDINAL: 1, 4, 5, 1982.2, 35,000, about 5,000, ten, about 10, 39,257, 30, 60,000, 1, more than 15, 269D, 75,000, 39,257, 35,000, 1986]159ITR105(Cal, 455, 5, 5, 6, 1986.7, 5, 5, 1, 5
DATE: September 10, 1981, April 24, 1973, 1961, December 27, 1973, annual, May 16, 1986, May 16, 1986, 1961, 1986, 1961, the 30th day of September, 1986, 1961, April 1, 1986, September 30, 1986, 1986, October 1, 1986, September 30, April 1, 1986, 1980, February 20, 1996--CIT v. Export India Corporation, 1986
PERSON: Gobind Ram, Damodar Dass, Shri Hari Shanker, Babu Lal, Narnaul, Shri Moti Lal Aggarwal, Narnaul, Rohtak, Rohtak, Shri Hari Ram, Shri Laxmi Narain Gupta, Bill, Bill, Chapter XX-A
ORG: Sections 269C, Appellate Tribunal, Appellate, Appellate Tribunal, Department, the Central Government, Board, Board, the Tribunal/High Court.8, Board, Finance, House, Board, the Tribunal/High Court, Board
GPE: New Delhi
MONEY: 15 per cent
PRODUCT: Section 269RR