Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Smt. Ram Piari Vs. Wealth-tax Officer and anr.

Decided On : Feb-04-1993

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 482, Section 55B, Section 17, Section 14(2, Section 17, Section 17A, Section 14.'6, Section 17, Section 17

ORG: J.B. Garg, Chandigarh, the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Section 35B of the Wealth tax Act, the Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, Shree Singhvi Bros., Union of India, CWT, CIT, Criminal Miscellaneous Nos

CARDINAL: 1, 5,666, 5,550, 1957.3, 825,09,5806,10,5803,8645,8401982, thirty, 1984]145ITR159(Delhi, 1983]142ITR183(All, 16,50,000, 5,666, 5,550, 1988.10

PERSON: Ram Piari, Shri Amar Nath, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, Ram Piari, Chandigarh, S. Harnam Singh Suri v. CBDT, J.K. Srivastava, Sant Parhash v.

DATE: 1957, March 27, 1991, the year, 1980-81, June 30, 1980, more than four years, August 23, 1984, 49 months, February 29, 1988, August 17, 1988, the assessment year 1980-81, 62, March 27, 1991, years 1975-76, 1981-82, March 27, 1991, July 1, 1980, 1957, October 25, 1990, October 30, 1990, five days, 1987, April 1, 1989, 1957, April 1, 1989, less than thirty days, the assessment year, year, the assessment year 1980-81, the year 1982-83, October 19, 1990, October 30, 1990, February 29, 1988, February 29, quashed.11, 1992

GPE: Singh

PRODUCT: P-3

ORDINAL: second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //