Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Shreeram Durgaprasad, Tumsar Vs. Union of India and ors.

Decided On : Dec-05-1961

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: section 30, section 30, Section 188, Section 191, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 30(b, Section 31, Section 30(b, Section 31, the Sea Customs Act, the Sea Customs Act, Section 182, Section 182, Section 182, Section 182, Section 23(3, Section 23(3, Section 23(3, Section 23, Section 23(3, the Sea Customs Act, Section 23(3, the Sea Customs Act, the Sea Customs Act the Collector, the Sea Customs Act, section 23(3, the Sea Customs Act, the Housing Act, section 30

CARDINAL: 316, 318, 476, 481, 486, 487, 492, 493, 501, 504, 508, 510, 513, 515, 40, 43, 2, 476, two, one, 28, 31, 58,069/9/-, two, 23,491/3/8, two, 3, 4, four, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8,48,225/15/2, 5, 28702/4/-, 6, 2, 1,56,776/15/-, 3/-, 3, 6, two, 1, 2, two, 1939]7ITR21(Mad, 2, 3, 10, 1, three, two, two, 12, two, 13

DATE: 1958, 1958, 1958, 1958, 1958, 1958, 1958, 1959, the period September, 1952, March, 1958, 1958, 6-9-1952, 11-9-1952, 31, 21-8-1954, 10,45,179/7/-, 18-5-1957, 10,45,179/7/-, 1930, 1935, section 31

ORG: Bishan Narain, the Excise Department, the Customs Department, the Collector of Customs, the Collector of Central Excise, the Customs Collector, the Central Board of Revenue, the Government of India, the Central Board Visakhapatnam, the Central Board of Revenue, the Government of India, the Union of India, The Collector of Customs, the Central Board of Revenue, The Central Board of Revenue, the Central Board of Revenue, The Central Government, the Customs Collector of Visakhapatnam, 1913/7/-, the Collector of Central Excise, the Central Board of Revenue, Calcutta, the Central Board of Revenue, the Customs House, the Central Board of Revenue, the Government of India, The Government of India, the Central Board of Revenue New Delhi, the Calcutta High Court, the Customs Collector of Visakhapatnam, the Central Board of Revenue, Reliance, the Lahore High Court, The Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court, Glaxo Laboratories, Private Ltd., Legislature, Court, Court, the Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court, the Customs Collector at Visakhapatnam, the Central Board of Revenue, the Customs Collector of Visakhapatnam, the Central Board of Revenue, Calcutta, Customs, the Customs Collector, the Central Board of Revenue, the Collector of Customs, Calcutta

PRODUCT: Bench, Calcutta, a Full Bench

GPE: the United States of America, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam, the United States of America, India, Chagla, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam, Bombay, Chagla

QUANTITY: 75,000 tons, 7,500 tons, 500 tons, 500 tons, 7877 tons

NORP: Indian, Indian, Indian, Punjab, Visakhapatnam

MONEY: 15 per cent, 15 per cent

ORDINAL: first, second, first, first, first, first

PERSON: 8,70,130/6/11, Sita Ram Gurdas Mal v. Collector of Central Excise, Bishan Narain, Bishan Narain j., Bishan Narain J., Bishan Narain J.'s, Gunda Subbayya, Madras, A.V. Venkateswaran, Coagula, C. J., Coagula, C. J., C. J. Therefore, C. J.

FAC: Bishan Narain J.

LOC: Gurmukh Singh

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //