Babu Ram Jagdish Kumar and Co. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Decided On : Mar-08-1976

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 31 of the Act, Section 31 of the Act, Section 4B, Punjab Act No, Article 246, the Punjab Rice Dealers Licensing Order, 1964, the Punjab Rice Procurement, Section 31 of the Act, Section 31 of the Act, Section 5(2)(a)(ii, Section 2(d, Section 2, Section 4, Section 5, Section 5(2, Section 6, Section 12, Act 7 of 1958, Section 2(d, Section 2, Section 4, Section 5 of the Act, Section 5, Section 2, Section 6, Section 6, Section 5(2)(a, Act No, Section 6, Section 6, Section 4 of the Act, Section 5(2)(a, Section 31, Section 6 of the Act, Section 6, Section 31, Section 6, Act No, Section 31, Section 5(2)(a, Section 31 of the Act, Section 31, Section 31, Article 143, Constitution of India, Article 143, Constitution of India, Article 143 of the Constitution of India, Section 3, Section 3 of the Act, Section 27, the Minimum Wages Act, the Minimum Wages Act, Section 27, Section 27, Section 6, Section 6 of the Act, Article 143, Constitution of India, Section 133, the Customs Regulation Act, Section 133, the Customs Regulation Act, Section 5 of the Act, Section 2(ff, Section 4(1, Section 4(2-A, Section 6, Section 6, Ssection 6 of the Act, Section 4 of the Act, Section 31, Section 4 of the Act, Section 6, Constitution, Section 5 of the Act, the Punjab Act No, Section 3-D, Section 3-D, Section 3, Section 31.27, Section 31 of the Act, Section 5(2)(a, Section 5(1, Section 5(2, Section 5(2, Section 5(2)(a, Section 6;(ii, Section 6, Section 6, Section 5(2)(a, Section 5(2)(a, the Indian Sale of Goods Act, Constitution, the Sales Tax Act, Section 2 of the Act, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 5(2)(a, Section 5(2)(a, Constitution, Rule 26, Section 5 of the Act, Section 5(2)(a, Article 286(2, Section 5(2)(a)(ii, Rule 25, Section 5(2)(a)(ii, Section 2(d, Section 2(d, Section 2 of the Act, Section 2(c, the Madhya Pradesh

PERSON: Harbans Lal, J.1, Schedule, and(5, Babu Ram, Company- v. State of Punjab, Schedule, Order, Schedule C, M.C. Bhandare, R.K. Chhiber, Schedule, Schedule B., Schedule, Schedule C., Schedule C, Schedule C, Schedule B., Schedule C., Schedule B, Schedule C, Schedule B, Schedule C, Schedule C, M.C. Bhandare, and(5, Delhi Laws Act, Rajnarain Singh v. Chairman, Harishankar Bagla v. State, Delhi Laws Act, Harishankar Bhagla's, Edward Mills', J., Baxter v. Ah Way, Bhandare, Delhi Laws Act, Rajnarain Singh's, Powell, Order, Schedule C, pledge.4, Schedule B. Obvious, Schedule B, Schedule C, Schedule C, Schedule, Devi Dass v. State of, Birla Cotton Spinning, Sita Ram Bishambhar Dayal v State of U. P. A.I.R., Him Lal Rattan Lal v. Sales Tax Officer, Kanpur A.I.R., and(4, Bhandare, Devi Dass Gopal, Schedule B., Schedule C. Subsequently, Schedule C, vi).34, Modi Nagar, T. XXII, Chandra Dey, Bhandare, concerned.40, H. Abdul Bakshi, i. e., Directorate, Madras, Tamil Nadu, Burmah Shell, Dixit

WORK_OF_ART: Civil Writ Petitions Nos, the Constitution of India

CARDINAL: 354, 416, 418, 432, 462, 473, 474, 495, 496, 497, 501, 504, 517, 519, 555, 556, 557, 564, 571, 576, 579, 582, 586, 614, 623, 644, 648, 669, 693, 694, 734, 736, 805, 855, 864, 870, 904, 226, 227, 354, 7, 23, 9, 10, 11, two, four, 2, 2, 13, 24, 13, 24, 1, 2, 28, 2, 28, 13, 24, 332, 569, 478, 332, three, 31, 8, 626, 637, 9, 909, one, 332, 10, 282, one, 1, one, 1958.4, 2-A, 1, 2, 909, one, two, 909, 19, two, 909, 909, One, seven, 909, 2, only two, 3, 367, 48, 1952, 3, 367, 1954, 5, 108, One, 54, 54, 92A, two, 10,00,000, 226, 227, three, three, 26, 27, 1, 26, 27, 27, 38, 1, 38, 144, 15, 335, 335, 1968, 21, 31, 426, 27, 373, 27, 379, 20, 287, 24, 343

DATE: 463, 524, 1975, 1948, tax;(2, 15th January, 1968, 1973, 54, 1975, 1958, 15th January, 1968, quarterly, the quarter ending 31st December, 1974, 30th January, 1975, today, 1948, 1959, 1959, 1959, 1958, 1960, 1st April, 1960, later than six months, the year, 1965, less than three months', 1965, the year 1958, the year 1965, 1948, 18th April, 1958, 19th April, 1959, 19th April, 1959, 14th July, 1959, 1959, 1965, 1st April, 1960, 1912, 1951, 1954, 1954, 1955, 1957, 1912, 1951, 1954, 1954, 1946, 1955, 1948, three months', 1948, 1909, 1958, 1958, 18th September, 1950, 1912, 1951, 1954, 1885, 1879, 1879, the year 1958, the year, 1958, 1965, S.C. 1107, 1958, 1895, 1968, S.C. 1232, 1958, 1958, 1972, 1958, 1973, 1948, 1958, 1952, 1939, 1935, 1967, 1895,wherein, 1948, the year 1958, the year 1958, the year 1948, six months, the year, 1965, 3rd January, 1956, 1949, 1962, 986, 1973, 1976, 17th May, 1975, 1964, 1967, 19 S.T.C. Sh, 19671 20, 1967, 19 S.T.C. Sh, 19671 20, 1941, 1973, 1971, daily, 1941, 1971, 1967, 1969

ORG: Schedule C, Civil Writ Petition No, Jagdish Kumar, Bold Group Rice, Slender Group Rice, the Punjab Government, the Punjab Government, the State Government, Schedule C, State, the Excise and Taxation Officer, Government, The State Government, Schedule C, accordingly.10, the State Government, the State Government, Schedule C, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Government, Schedule C;(4, the Supreme Court, Reliance, Patna Administration Committee, Madhya Pradesh, S.C. 465, Edward Mills Company Limited, S.C. 25, Bhatnagars and Company Limited v. Union of India A.I.R., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, S.C. 569, Lordships, Reliance, S.C. 465:, the Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers, S.C. 25, Government, State, State, State, the Supreme Court, O'Connor, the High Court of Australia, C.L.R., the Supreme Court, Pandit Banarsi Das Bhanot v. State of, Pandit Banarsi Das Bhanot, the State of Madhya Pradesh, the Madhya Pradesh Sales Tax Act, Schedule II, the State Government, S.C. 369, the Supreme Court, Apollo Candle Company, Lordships, the Supreme Court, Schedule C, Sections 5 and, the Supreme Court, Pandit Banarsi Das Bhanot's, the State Government, Schedule B, the State Government, Schedule B, the State Government, State, Schedule, the State Government, Pandit Banarsi Das Bhanot's, Corporation of Calcutta v. Liberty Cinema A.I.R, Pandit Banarsi Das Bhanot's, the Supreme Court, the State Government, the State Government, Government, the State Government, Municipal Corporation, Pandit Banarsi Das Bhanot's, the Supreme Court, Banarsi Das's, S.C. 1168, Pandit Banarsi Das Bhanot's, the United Provinces Sales Tax Act, the Supreme Court, arise;(3, the State Government under Section 31, Schedule C, the State Government under Section 6, the Supreme Court, Pandit Banarsi Das Bhanot's, the State Government, Schedule C, the State of Punjab, V.M. Syed Mohamed and Company v. State, the Madras General Sales Tax Act, the Provincial Legislative List, the Government of India Act, the Madras Legislature, V.M. Syed Mohamed and Company's, the Supreme Court, V.M. Syed Mohamed and Company v. State of Andhra, the Supreme Court, the State Legislature, List I.32, purchaser, correctly.33, Modi Spinning, Weaving Mills Company Limited v., Sales Tax, S.C. 957, M/s. Modi Spinning, Weaving Mills Company, the Assessing Authority, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the State of Punjab, State, the State of Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, Lordships of the Supreme Court, State of Assam v., the State of Punjab, the State of Punjab, State, State, the State of Punjab ', Food Corporation of India, the Food Corporation of India, the Food Corporation of India, the State Governments, the Central Government, High Courts, State of Andhra Pradesh, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Calcutta, Board of Revenue, Calcutta, the Directorate of Disposals, the Government of India, the Government of India, the Government of India, the Supreme Court, Directorate, The Bengal Finance, Saidapet, Enfield India Limited Co, Canteen Limited, Lordships of the Supreme Court, Distributing Company of India Ltd., S.T.C., the Supreme Court, Indian Iron and Steel Company Limited, Board of Revenue, the Bengal Finance, Motor Industries Company Limited v. State of Mysore, Coimba-tore Division, Coimbatore, Sri Thirumagal Mills Limited, Sales Tax

EVENT: List II, S.C. 1034

GPE: Kapurthala, paddy, Clause, India, S.C., S.C., Beawar, S.C., S.C., India, Rajnarain, A.I.R., A.I.R., conduct.14, A.I.R., S.C., A.I.R., S.C., S.C., A.I.R., A.I.R., S.C., A.I.R., S.C., Delhi, Weaving Mills, Delhi, A.I.R., A.I.R., S.C., A.I.R., S.C., A.I.R., S.C., A.I.R., S.C., India, S.C., Krishnan v. State, S.C., India, A.I.R., Assam, Assam, Assam, paddy, States, States, States, S.C., S.C., West Bengal, S.C., S.C., S.C., S.C., West Bengal, S.C.

MONEY: 95 per cent, 90 per cent, 95 per cent, 95 per cent

PRODUCT: P-3, P-3, P-3, Kapurjhalq,5, Calcutta, 317

ORDINAL: first, second, first, first, first, second, third

LOC: A.I.R. 1958 S

NORP: Punjab, Punjab, Punjab, Punjab, inter-State, Rules, Punjab, American