Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Maharaja Shri Devi Singh Ji Vs. Wealth-tax Officer

Decided On : Oct-31-1985

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

LAW: Section 14(1, Section 18(1, Section 17, Section 14(2, Section 18(1)(a, Section 15 of the Act, Section 1.4, Section 14(1, Section 14(2, Section 18(1)(a, Section 17, Section 14(2, Section 18(1)(a, Section 18(1, Section 271(1)(a, Section 139(2, Section 274, Section 271(1)(a, Section 271(1, Section 271

CARDINAL: 1, 30-6-1958, 30, 30, 30-6-1961, 26, 4,849, 8,444, 9,290, 4,891, 1-4-1965, 1-4-1965, 26, four, two, 1, 30-6-1958, 30, 30, 30-6-1961, 26, 4,849, 8,444, 9,290, 4,891, 1-4-1965, 19-12-1983, four, one, 18, 6, 24,370, 150, 120, 270, 271, 83, 26, 146, 5, 13-4-1964, 103, 149

DATE: the above assessment years, 1957, the assessment years 1958-59 to 1960-61, the assessment year 1961-62, the above years, all those years, years 1958-59, 1959-60, the assessment years 1960-61, 1961-62, 1964, each month, one and a half, all the years, these years, years 1958-59, 1959-60, these years, 25 years of age, those days, years 1958-59 to 1961-62, 1957, years 1958-59 to 1961-62, the assessment years 1958-59 to, the assessment year 1961-62, the above years, all the years, two assessment years 1958-59, 1959-60.For, the other years, the first two years, the other two years, 1964, July 1954, April 1960, those days, 25 years of age, 1984, 1979, 1961, 1972, 1984, the assessment, year 1962-63, December 1962, 1976, years

ORG: WTO, Act, WTO, WTO, WTO, AAC, AAC, AAC, HUF, the Mayo College, WTO, IAC, IAC, WTO, IAC, IAC, WTO, AAC, WTO, IAC, Tribunal, WTO, WTO, WTO, WTO, AAC, AAC, Tribunal, Tribunal, WTO, IAC, IAC, IAC, Judicial, the Rajasthan High Court, WTO, the High Court, Maharaja Umed Singh, Maharaja Hanumant Singh, the Jodhpur Estate, Maharaja Hanumant Singh, the Government of Rajasthan, Tribunal, WTO, AAC, Tribunal, WTO, AAC, Judicial, Judicial, HUF, Tribunal, CWT, Maharajadhiraj Himmat Singhji, the High Court, the Rajasthan High Court, CIT, Rawat Singh &amp, Sons, the High Court, Rajasthan High Court, the Supreme Court, Hindustan Steel Ltd., Rajasthan High Court, the Commissioner of Income-tax under Section 256(2, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Rajasthan High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Gauhati High Court, Sewbalakram &amp, Co., CIT, the Gauhati High Court, ITO, ITO, Tribunal, the High Court, the Gauhati High Court, the High Court, ITO, CIT, Gujarat Travancore Agency, Rawat Singh &amp, the Rajasthan High Court, High Court, the Rajasthan High Court, Tribunal

QUANTITY: 20-1-1962

ORDINAL: second, Firstly, Secondly, Thirdly, first, Secondly, Third, Third, fourth, third, first, Third

NORP: jagir, jagir

PERSON: Ajmer, Maharajadhiraj Himmat Singhji, Son

MONEY: two per cent, 50 per cent

PRODUCT: Accountant, Accountant, Accountant, 416, Accountant, the Full Bench, The Full Bench, Accountant, Bench

FAC: the Rajasthan High Court, the Jodhpur Estate

GPE: Maharaja, Jodhpur, Orissa, Kohima, Kohima, Kohima

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //