Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner, Central Excise Commissionerate Vs. Uniproducts (India) Limited

Decided On : Jan-27-2009

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 35, Rule 52A(1, Chapter VIII A, Chapter VII-A, Rule 52A(1, Section 4

PERSON: M.M. Kumar, J.1, Court, Schedule, Gurpreet Singh, v. Lakshmikumaran, V. Lakshmikumaran, xiii, Ludhiana, Ludhiana, Gurgaon

DATE: 1944, January 1998 to November 1998, 1985, 6559-6560, 1997, 24.7.2003, 1944, 2007, 2007, 2008

ORG: Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, CESTAT, the Supreme Court, Customs & Central Excise and Ors, Charminar Nonwovens Ltd., the Commissioner (Appeals, the Assessee-Respondent, the Assessee-Respondent, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Counsel, Learned Counsel, Tribunal, Court, Court, Box Factory Ltd., P&H, Central Excise, Varinder Agro Chemical Ltd., P&H, Alcatel Modi Network System Ltd., the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Central Board of Excise, Customs, Invoice-Particulars, Address of consignee:(iv) Description and Specification of goods:(v, PLA, Registration No.:(xviii)Appropriate, S. No, S. No

GPE: New Delhi, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Assessee, not.4, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee

LOC: Respondent

CARDINAL: 5703.90, 27.1.1998, 218, 355, 219, 160, 221, 358, 52A, 52A, 1, 52A

NORP: CESTAT, Rules, Rules, Rules

ORDINAL: first

FAC: Range

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //