Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

State of Punjab Vs. Sukhminder Singh Alias Mundri

Decided On : Mar-04-1998

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 439(2, Section 482, Section 302, Section 167(2, Section 167(2, Section 167(2, Section 439(2, Section 167(2)(a, Section 167(2)(a, Chapter (b, Explanation 11, Section 167 of 1898 Code, Section 344, Section 309, Section 167, Section 344, Section 167, Section 167 of the Code, Section 167(2, Chapter XXXIII, Section 167, Section 20(4, Section 167(2, Section 20(4)(b, Section 20, Section 167 of the Code, Section 20(4, Section 167 of the Code, Section 20(4)(bb, Section 167(2, Section 167, The Section 167, Section 20(4)(bb, Section 167(2, Section 167 of the Code, Section 167(2)(a, Section 167(2, Section 167(2)(a, Section 439(2, Section 482, Section 439(2

ORG: ORDER1, IPC, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, the Court of Session, Court, Advocate-General, State of M.P., the Madhya Pradesh High Court, the Madhya Pradesh Court, Goverdhan, Magistrate, the Bombay High Court, Bar, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the High Court, Explanation - 1, Magistrate, the Apex Court, Central Bureau of Investigation, Special Investigation Cell, AIR 1992, The Apex Court, Court, the Law Commission, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, Commission, Magistrate, The Joint Committee, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Apex Court, State of, Magistrate, Magistrate, Parliament, Magistrate, TADA, Court, TADA, Court, the Designated Court, TADA, Designated Court, Court, Court, Court, the Designated Court, the Apex Court, Cri LJ 1652, the Apex Court, Gujarat High Court, the Apex Court, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court

PERSON: Sukhminder Singh, Station Longowal, N. K. Kapoor, Upkar Singh v. State of Punjab, Khambhadhur Palshiram Thapa, Goverdhan, Misc, Bench, Bench, Bench, Magistrate, Anupam J. Kulkarni, Cri LJ, Bill, Hitendra Vishnu Thakur v., Magistrate, Hitendra Vishnu Thakur's, Sanjay Dutt v. State, Cri LJ, Hitendra Vishnu Thakur, Hitendra Vishnu Thakur, Hitendra Vishnu Thakur, Bipin Shantilal Panchal, Cri LJ, Desai v. State, Cri LJ, Upkar Singh's

CARDINAL: 81, 2, 2., 4, 18, 3., 13, 4., 6-3-1997, 5, 2-4-1997, 18, 6, 4, 18, 18, 3, 543, three, 3, 104, 3, 955, 8, 1, 955, 9, 19-10-1988, 5, 19-1-1989, 17, 2, 10, 5, 6, 2, 11, 4, 602, 2, 4, 12, 5, 410, 502, 13, 1, 505, 1, 600, 3, 451, 1610, 15, 16, 17, 18

GPE: District Sangrur, Sangrur, Sangrur, Ld, Ld, P.C., Gujarat, Aslam, Gujarat

DATE: 18-10-1996, 82 days, 1996, 90 days, 18-10-1996, 82 days, the period of, 90 days, 1989, 1993, 24-9-1993, 1993, 1993, 90 days, the 91st day, 90 days, fifteen days, the period of fifteen days, ninety days, less than ten years, sixty days, ninety days, sixty days, 1768, 1992, 2771-2772, 15 days, 15 days, the period of, 15 days, 15 days, 15 days, 60 days, 50 days, 15 days, two years, six months, 1978, 90 days, 60 days, 90 days, 1994, 1995, 15 days, 1994, 1995, 180 days, 1996, 1996, 1653, 1993, ' 14, 1997, 1997, 60/90 days, 90 days, 18-1-1997

TIME: 9-1-1997, 9-1-1997, 9-1-1989, 24 hours, 24 hours, 9-1-1997

FAC: Khimbhadur Parlshiram Thapa's, Pramod Hariprasad Tiwari

PRODUCT: Section 167(2, Chapter XXXIII, Cri LJ 2768, Cri LJ 517, Cri LJ 477, Cri LJ 1605

ORDINAL: Second

WORK_OF_ART: 'The Constitution of India

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //