Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Gurbakhsh Singh Vs. S. Partap Singh and anr.

Decided On : Nov-05-1958

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 3 of the Contempt of Courts Act, Article 226 of the Constitution, section 3 o the Contempt of Courts Act.5, Cal 53, Section 3 of the Contempt of Courts Act

PERSON: A.N. Bhandabi, S. Gurbakhsh Singh, S. Partap Singh I. F. S., S. Bachan Singh, S. Partap Singh, S. Partap Singh, S. Partap Singh, S. Bachan Singh, John, Andrews, Wallen, Andrews, Turk, Turk, Wallen, Andrews, Wallen, Wilson v. Irwin, Wilson, Irwin, Irwin, Oswald, Rajender Singh v. Uma Prasad, ho, Chandra Pal v., Abdul Baki, Firm Nagpur, Webster v. Bakewell Rural District Council, Lechmere Charlton's, S.S. Dulat J.15

ORG: the Punjab Government, the Punjab Forest Department, Divisional Forest, Court, Court, Government, Government, Government, the Magna Carta ', Contempt of Court, Court, Court, SW, Court, Court, Court, Court, Wilson, Wilson, Court, Justice, Wilson, Court, Court, AIR 1935 All, Court, Court, AIR, the High Court, Government, Government, Court, State, LJ Ch 326, Court, Court, Court, Government, Court

NORP: Punjab, Punjab, American, Irwin, English

CARDINAL: 1,136/9/7, only two, 341, 185, 472, one, one, 144, 311, 13S, 373, one, 117, two, 1, 300, 85, 6

DATE: the 20th May 1957,4, Some three months later, the 30th August 1957, the 25th January 1953, the year 1215, 19161 123, the day, 1911, '10, 1945, 1916, '13, 1837

ORDINAL: first, first, first, Secondly

GPE: India, Governmental, Turk v. State, Turk, England, India, Bansilal, Court.12

TIME: terms:'I am

QUANTITY: 20 feet

PRODUCT: LJ Ch 185

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //