Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Kundan Rice and General Mills and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Decided On : Sep-11-1996

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Order 38, Article 323B, Article 323B., Constitution, Chapter II, Section 17, Chapter VI, Section 10, Section 17, the Limitation Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, Article 323B(2).12, Constitution, article 14, article 149 of the Limitation Act, article 14, Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution, the Civil Procedure Code, Article 226 and Article 227 of the Constitution, Article 14, Chapter V-A of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, Article 14 of the, Article 323B(2).21, the 42nd Amendment Act, Article 323A, Article 323B, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 323B, Constitution, Constitution, Article 38A, Article 50, Constitution, Article 39A., article 50, Section 7, Section 7A, Section 7B, Section 5, Section 65, Constitution, Section 17, Comp Cas

PERSON: Jawaharlal Gupta, O. P. Goyal, Arun Jain, Cas 849.5, M. Narasimham, Shri Tiwari, Bill, Bill, Reg, Goyal, Manna Lal v. Collector of, Constitution Benches, Goyal, Articles 323A, Reg, Articles 39A, Reg, Goyal, Nos, Wade, Administrative Law

NORP: J.1

ORG: the Recovery of Debts Due to, the Bank of India, the Additional Senior Subordinate, the Debt Recovery Tribunal, inter alia, Tribunal, the Delhi High Court, Delhi High Court Bar Association v. Union of India, the Government of India, The Tiwari Committee, inter alia, Parliament, the Recovery of Debts Due to, Banks and Financial Institutions Ordinance, Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Chapter IV--Sections, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunals, the Central Government, the Central Government, Tribunals, Tribunal, the Central Government, Appellate, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunals, Tribunal, a High Court, Appellate Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the Central Government, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Parliament, Tribunal, State, the Government of a State, State, Government, Government, Builders Supply Corporation v. Union of India, Union of India, State, State, State, State, Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay, the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, the Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, Corporation, the State Government, Corporation, Lordships, Suraj Mall Mohta's, the High Court, Legislature, the Bombay Government Premises (Eviction) Act, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Tribune, crores)State Bank of India3,180.00Punjab National Bank1,075.03Bank of India974.49Canara Bank943.39Central Bank of India594.98Indian, Parliament, Parliament, Administrative Tribunals, the High Courts, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, State, State, Tribunals, Parliament, the Central Government, the Central Government, State, State, Tribunal, State, the Central Government, Government, Labour Courts, Government, the Central Government, National Industrial Tribunals, the Central Government, Commission, Commission, a State Government, the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, the Central Government, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, the Central Government, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Delhi High Court, Delhi High Court Bar Association's, Lordships

DATE: 1993, 12901 of 1996, September 8, 1986, October 20, 1987, October 21, 1988, January 5, 1994, quarterly, December 19, 1994, 1993, 1995, 1998, June 24, 1993, five years, the age of 60 years, 30 days, Articles 14, 60 years, 1950, '14, 1955, 1955, 2027, today, '16, September 3, 1996, the same day, 1976, 1969, 1988, 1987, 1995, 1998, '31, down.32

CARDINAL: two, 2, 15, 25, 35, about 70, 5, 2, 10, 92, 6, six, 1, 10, 3, 16, 17, 18, 19, 25, 30, 31, 37, two-fold, half, 1961]2SCR962, 1962]2SCR324, 1965]56ITR91(SC, 1, 1975]1SCR1, two, one, two, 2022, 2023, two, two, 1954]26ITR1(SC, one, more than one, two, two, 10, seven, 323B, two, 2, 43, 43, 95, 11, 50, one, one, one, 226, 227, 10, 92

WORK_OF_ART: Civil Writ Petition No, Presiding Officers

ORDINAL: second, Firstly, Secondly, second, first, second

MONEY: 18.25 per cent, 75 per cent

GPE: Jaipur, decisions.10, India, Rajasthan, India, Bombay

PRODUCT: DLT 815, DLT 815

LANGUAGE: Chapters

FAC: Maganlal Chhagganlal

LOC: Lists II

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //