K. S. Rashid Ahmad Vs. Income-tax Investigation Commission and Another.

Decided On : Aug-10-1950

Court : Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 26A, Section 6, Constitution, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Constitution, Article 226 nor Article 227, Section 8 of the Act, Section 34, Section 15, Section 34, Chapter XI, Charter, Article 225 of the Constitution, Chapter XI, the Estate Land Act, Article 225 of the Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Article provides, Constitution, Article 225 nor Article 226, Article 226, Article 32, Article 32.'Article, Article 226, Article 225.I, Section 8 of the Act, section 8, Section 67, section 8, Section 5, Section 9 of the Act, Section 5, Section 9, Section 5(3, Section 9 of the Act, Section 22, the Indian Press Act, the Indian Act, the Press Act, Section 9, Section 8, Constitution, Section 9, Article 225, Constitution, Constitution, the Article 226, Constitution, Article 227, Section 5(3, Article 226

ORG: ORDERKAPUR, Commission, the Central Government, the Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Lordships, Commission, Lordships, the Investigation Commission, Court, Court, Commission, Court, State, Commission, Court, the State of U. P., the High Court at Allahabad, Commission, the High Court at Allahabad, Central Government, the Excess Profits Tax Act, Commission, Commission, Sections 30, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the High Court, Bench, the High Court, the Excess Profits Tax Act, the High Court at Allahabad, Commission, Ryots of Garabandho v. Zamindar, the High Court, Board of Revenue, the Madras Estates Land Act, the Board of revenue, Board, the Collective Board of Revenue, the Collective Board of Revenue, The High Court, the Board of Revenue, the Privy Council, the High Court, Lordships, the Board of revenue, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Lordships, Board of Revenue, the Collective Board, the High Court, the Board of Revenue, the High Court, the Board of Revenue, the Board of Revenue, the Supreme Court, the Board of Revenue, the Supreme Court, Court, the Investigation Commission, Court, Commission, the High Court, the High Court, Board of revenue, the High Court, the Board of Revenue, the Privy Council, Mandasa, Court, Commission, Legislature, Legislature, Court, Court, Court, Division Courts, this High Court, Court, the High Court of Allahabad, Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Legislature, the High Court, Panckridge, State, the Lahore High Court, the Privy Council, Raleigh Investment Company, Ltd., Council, Rubber Works, Ltd., Bombay Evacuees (Administration of Property, Court, Court, the Central Government, Court, Commission, Court, Crown, Legislature, Legislature, Reliance, the Privy Council, Besant v. Advocate-General, the High Court, Lordships, Parliament, Commissioners, Crown, State, the Privy Council, Court, Commission, the Privy Council, Court, the Privy Council, the Calcutta High Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, General Mills Company Limited v. Income-tax Commissioner, Lordships, the Board, Colonial Sugar Refining Co., Irving, the Tribunal under Section 5(1, the Civil Courts, Court

DATE: 1947, the 31st of December, 1947, the 5th of May, 1934, the 7th of January, 1946, the following day, the 31st of March, 1943, years, 1947, the 13th of May, 1948, the 9th of April, 1949, 1949, the 10th June, the 15th of July, 1949, the 29th of October, 1949, the 22nd of November, 1949, the 14th of November, 1949, the 22nd November to 26th November, the 15th of July, 1949, the 31st of March, 1943, the 7th September, 1949, 1950, 1950, 1950, 1950, 1946, the 26th January, 1950, the 13th of June, 1950, the 25th July, 1950, 1922, 1922, 1940, the 31st day of December 1938, 1922, 1922, 1940, 1940, 1922, 31, 33, 1922, 1922, 1940, 60 days, 1922, 1922, the 1st day of, September 1948, between that day, the 26th of January, 1950

PERSON: Rama Nand Jain, K. S. Rashid, Son, K. S. Rashid Ahmad, K. S. Rashid and Son, K. S. Rashid Ahmad, Saeed Ahmad, Saeeda Begum, Zafar Mohd, K. S. Rashid, Son, Zafar Mohd, K. S. Rashid Ahmad, Saeed Ahmad, Saeeda Begum, Rama Nand Jain, Hidayat Ullah, Rawalpindi, K. S. Rashid Ahmad, Ordinance, Zafar Mohd, Saeeda Begum, Civil Miscellaneous No, K. S. Rashid Ahmad, Civil Miscellaneous No, K. S. Rashid, Saeeda Begum, Civil Miscellaneous No, K. S. Rashid, Son, Lordships, Zaffar Mohd, Meerut, Viscount Simon, Certiorari, Viscount Simon, L. C., Nundo Lal Bose v. Calcutta Corporation, Viscount Simon, Lordships, Rathnamala Pattamahadevi v., Ramesam, J., Thin Yen, Clarke Lord, Esher, Sultan Ali v. Nur Hussain, Madras, Allen, Phillimore, Certiorari, Allen v. Sharp, Elizabeth, Rishindra Nath v. Rai Saheb, Bhusan Ray, Delhi Cloth

CARDINAL: 20, 3, 1949.In, 9, one, three, four, 259, 260, 261, 262, two, 2, 2, 5, 6, 1922).(5, 2, 33A, 4, 100, 2, 33A, three, 37 1/2, Two, 1, 8), 496, 595, 468, 9, 1, 1, 2, 225, 5, three, 707, 5, 3, 3, 3, 1, 42, 2, 43, 3, 43, 3, 161, 5, 227, 425, 250

ORDINAL: first, third, first, first, first, 9th, 30th

GPE: Pakistan, Delhi, Delhi, Meerut, Parlakimedi, Parlakimedi, Province, Ganjam, Ganjam, Meerut, Delhi, Ghaziabad, Mandasa, Essex, India, England, India, Delhi

NORP: Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Zamindar, English

FAC: Sections 66 and 66A, Sections 66 and 66A, Madras

PRODUCT: Bench, Sharp, Geo, Geo

LOC: Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras

PERCENT: only 12 1/2 per cent

MONEY: 100 per cent

WORK_OF_ART: Collector of Bombay this Bench

TIME: under this Act, under this Act

LANGUAGE: English