S.R. Arulprakasam Vs. Income-tax Officer

Decided On : Dec-20-1984

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

LAW: Section 139(5, Section 139(5, Section 139(5, Section 271(l)(c, Section 273A of the Act, Section 139(5, Section 139(5, Section 139(5, Section 139(5, Section 139(5, Section 139(5, Section 139(5, Section 139(5, Section 255(4, Section 271(l)(c, Section 271(l)(c, Section 139(5, Section 139(5, Section 139(5, Section 139(5, Section 139(5, Section 139(5, Section 139(5, Section 271, Section 139(5, Section 139(5, Section 139(5, Section 139(5, Section 139(5, Section 139(5, Section 139(5

CARDINAL: 1, two, half, one, 82,000, 1,03,740, 2,36,248, 1,32,500, 1,03,740, 77, 276, 1977, 110, two, 2,36,240, 1,10,256, 85,698, three, more than one, 1,03,740, 12-3-1978, 85,698, 16, 28-4-1978, 28-4-1978, 2,36,240, 1,32,500, one, 12-3-1978, 1,44,500, 1,32,500, 1,32,500, 1,32,500, 28-4-1978, 1,10,255.59, 85,698, 55,000, 1,32,500, three, 1977, 110, 419, three, 85,698, three, 1,03,740, 31-3-1977.Sometime, 12, three, 13, 10, one, 1,06,451, 1,10,256, 21,652, 28-4-1978, 1,32,500, 2,36,248, 1,10,256(ii, One-fourth, one-fourth, 3,988, 21,652(iv, 5,575, 1,93,883 83,517, 300, one-fourth, 2,362, 274, 116 86,779, 1,907Business, 5, 2,97,6271976, 2,79,670, 1,93883Balance, 1,03740Add, 1,32,500, 1,907Balance, 2,34,233, 6, 1,32,500.7, 1,32,500, three, three, three, 1,44,500, 1,44,500, 1,32,500, 1,44,500, 1,32,500, 1,32,500, 1,32,500, 11-10-1977, 1,10,000, 1,32,500, 1,44,500, 132, 102, 408, 123

ORG: ITO, The Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, Judicial, IAC, CL, ITO, The Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, ITO, Tribunal, CIT, CIT v., Tribunal, ITO, the Tribunal is Rs, the Commissioner (Appeals, ADI, ADI, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Intelligence Wing, ADI, ADI, Hems, ITO, ADI, ITO, ITO, ITO, ADI, Intelligence, the Allahabad High Court, Amjad AH Nazir AH v., CIT, Madras High Court, the Commissioner (Appeals, ADI, Tribunal, Tribunal, ITO, Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, ITO, Tribunal, ITO, Tribunal, ITO, Tribunal, Tribunal, ITO, Tribunal, ITO, ITO, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, Judicial, Tribunal, the , department, Judicial, the Allahabad High Court, The Allahabad High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Madras High Court, CIT, ITR 623, E.E., l)(c, The Kerala High Court, the Gauhati High Court, F.C. Agarwal v., CIT, The Allahabad High Court, CIT, The Allahabad High Court, Judicial, Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals

ORDINAL: first, first, first, Third, Third, Third, first, first, second, first

DATE: 2,17,910, 11-10-1977, 14-3-1978, April 1978, 1970, 1961, 11-10-1977, 14-3-1978, 17-3-1978, December 1976, August 1977, November 1977, 11-10-1977, the assessment year 1977-78, 10-10-1979, 15-11-1979, 28-4-1978, the same accounting year, the assessment year 1977-78, 1,10,256, the past year's, year, the latter assessment year 1978-79, 1961, 1961 1, 1961, 11-10-1977, the assessment year 1977-78, previous year, 14-3-1978, 11-10-1977, 1976-77, 17,956 2,79,670"(i, year 1975-76, 2,34,233, 2,17,910, one and a half, a month, 11-10-1977, 11-10-1977, the assessment year 1977-78, 1981, 1976, 1980, false.11

PERSON: Ramdas Pharmacy, Ramdas Pharmacy's, Ramdas Pharmacy, Rs, J.K.A.Subramania Chettiar, income.4, Amjad Ali Nazir Ali, wherein, Rs, Haji P. Mohammed, Addl, Radhey Shyam

GPE: Subramania, J.K.A., Subramania, assessee, Ramdas Pharmacy's, J.K.A., Subramania, J.K.A., Subramania, J.K.A., Subramania

PRODUCT: Accountant, Accountant, Accountant, Accountant, Accountant, Bench