income-tax Officer Vs. Maleh Narasimhaiah Setty

Decided On : Dec-19-1984

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

LAW: Section 16(i, Section 16(i, Section 67, the Chandigarh Bench, The Chandigarh Bench, Section 255(3, Section 16, Section 40(6, Section 67, Section 67(l)(a, Section 67(l)(a, Section 67(l)(a, Section 67(l)(b, Section 16, Section 16(i, Section 15 of the Act, Section 16(0, Section 2(31, Section 40(b, Section 67, Section 16(0, Section 67(2, Section 10(l)(b, Section 40(b, Section 67, Section 67, the General Clauses Act, Section 4, the Indian Partnership Act, Section 16, Section 15, Section 16, Section 15, Section 16(i).14

CARDINAL: 1, 11, 6,000, 5,000, 6, 250, two hundred and fifty, 31-3-1982, 15,960, 303, 3, 779, 787, 16-6-1983, 4, 106, 292, one, 29, one, 100, three, 10, 10, 30, 30, 2, 1, 130, 129, 203, 121, 97, two, 138, 146, 78, 33, 29, 535, 540, 541, 154, 1880, 14, 122, 126, two, two, 86, 122, 15, 2, 3., one

DATE: year 1982-83.The, year, the previous year ended, year 1982-83, 1961, 1981, 1983, 1977, 1325, 1324, 1978-79, 30 to 39, 40, 1952, 1957, 1981, 1980, 1982, 1984, 1970, 1922, 1956, 1956, 1897, 1303, 1972, the previous year, the previous year, the previous year, earlier previous year, any previous year

ORG: Laxminarasimha Fertilisers, Nagamani, Nagamani 40 per cent, year.2, Laxminarasimha Fertilisers, ITO, AAC, AAC, AAC, Laxminarasimha Fertilisers, AAC, Tribunal, AAC, AAC, Bench, Tribunal, ITO, the Supreme Court, CIT, Bench, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, HUF, the Supreme Court, East End Dwellings Co. Ltd., Borough Council, AC 109, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, CWT, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, CIT, Sons, AAC, HUF, CIT, CIT, HUF, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, CIT, ITR, HUF, HUF, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Privy Council, the Supreme Court, the Privy Council, Court, CIT, SC, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, CIT, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, HUF, HUF, the Supreme Court, ITO, AAC, ITO

GPE: Gadwal, M. Nagamani, Gadwal, Sections, Scotland, Shand

ORDINAL: second, second, second, second

PERSON: M. Laxmidevamma, Laxmidevamma, Laxmidevamma, Shri B. Prahalad, Mohamad Ibrahim Shahdad v. ITO, R.M. Chidambaram Pillai, R.M. Chidambaram Pillai's, profession',-, R.M. Chidambaram Pillai, Fins, Narendra Ranjalker, G. Parthasarathy Naidu &, R.M. Chidambaram Pillai, Das, Atma Ram Budhia, Pat, R.M. Chidambaram Pillai's, Singh Hukamchandji, Singh Hukamchandji's, R.M. Chidambaram Pillai, R.M. Chidambaram Pillai's, R.M.Chidambaram Pillai, Dulichand Laxminarayan v., James L.J., Corbett, Addanki Narayanappa v., Bhaskara Krishnappa, R.M. Chidambaram Pillai's, Ram Prashad, R.M. Chidambaram Pillai, Salaries'-, R.M. Chidambaram Pillai, Singh Hukamchandji, R.M. Chidambaram Pillai, R.M. Chidambaram Pillai

MONEY: 40 per cent, 20 per cent, 20 per cent, 20 per cent

WORK_OF_ART: The Pune Bench, Raj Kumar Singh Hukamchandji

NORP: Harbans, Indian, English, English, Indian, Indian, English, Indian

PRODUCT: Bench, the Hyderabad Bench, 240

EVENT: the 1961 Act

LANGUAGE: English, English, English, English, English