Ceat International Vs. Inspecting Assistant

Decided On : Nov-26-1984

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

LAW: Section 9(1)(vi, Section 9(1)(vii, Section 9(1)(vii, Section 9(1)(vii, Explanation 2 to Section 9(1)(vi, Section 9(1)(vii, Section 9(1))(vi, Section 9(1)(vii, Explanation 2 to Section 9(1)(vi, Explanation 2 to Section 9(1)(vii, Section 9, Section 35

CARDINAL: 1, two, 10-2-1982, 4.70, four, four, four, 9(1)(vii, 2, 4, 9(1)(vi, 9(1)(vii).6

ORG: the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Ceat Tyres of, India Ltd., ITO, Ceat Tyres of, India Ltd., Ceat, IAC, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Ceat, Legislature, Legislature, Section 35B of the Act, the Legislature in Sections, Legislature, Clauses, Legislature, Legislature, Shri B.A. Palkhivala, Ceat, Ceat Tyres of, India Ltd., Ceat Tyres of, Ceat Tyres of, India Ltd., Legislature, Legislature, Clauses, the Ceat Tyres of, India Ltd., the Ceat Tyres of, India Ltd., Ceat, Ceat

MONEY: 50 per cent, five per cent, 15 per cent, 50 per cent, 75 per cent

DATE: 1961, Section 9(1)(vi).5

TIME: 9-9-1977, 9-9-1977

NORP: Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian

GPE: Clauses, Clauses, India, Clauses, Clauses, Counsel, India, Clauses

ORDINAL: First, second, third, fourth, Firstly, Secondly

PERSON: Shri B.A. Palkhivala, Shri Roy Alphonso, Shri B.A. Palkhivala