Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. V.C.H. Tate
Decided On : Aug-31-1984
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras
LAW: Section 256(1, Section 256(1, Section 255(4, Section 255(4, Section 256(1
CARDINAL: 1, 30-6-1983, 105, 2, 21-6-1980, 83,736, 24, 22, 31, 11-11-1982, 390, 22-12-1981, 118, 617, 116, 20, 14, 390, 1, 2, 31, 390, 3
DATE: 1961, 1983, years 1975-76, 1978-79, year 1975-76, year 1975-76, year 1975-76, years 1975-76, 1978-79, 1982, 1981-82, 1979, 1983, 97, 98, 1983, 1982, 1961, the assessment year 1979-80, the assessment year 1979-80, years 1975-76, 1978-79, 1271, 1983, years 1975-76, 1978-79, 97, 98, 1983, year 1975-76, 97, 98, 1983, 1982, 97, 98, 1983, years 1975-76, 1978-79, the assessment year, 97, 98, 1983, years 1975-76, 1978-79
ORG: Tribunal, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, ITO, AAC, ITO, Tribunal, AAC, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Judicial, Tribunal, C-Bench's, the Commissioner (Appeals, Kerala High Court, CIT, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, the Commissioner of Income-tax, Tribunal, Judicial, the Commissioner of Income-tax, Tribunal, ITO, ITO, AAC, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court of Judicature, the Appellate Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, Judicial, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Judicial, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Judicial, Judicial, Bench
GPE: UK, India, assessee, assessee, R.A., India, R.A., R.A., R.A., R.A., R.A.
PERSON: Shri M.Narayanan
ORDINAL: Third, Third, Third
PRODUCT: Accountant