Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

income-tax Officer Vs. Abdulrahim Khan M. Pathan

Decided On : Aug-26-1983

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

LAW: Section 64(1)(ii, Section 2(15A, Section 147, Section 664(l)(z7, Section 2(15A, Section 64(1)(ii, Section 2(15A, Section 2(15A, Section 64, Section 64, Section 64, Section 64, Section 2(15A, Section 64, Section 64, Section 2(15A).We, Section 64, Section 2(15A, Section 64, Section 64, Section 64

CARDINAL: 1, seven, two, two, 22, two, two, 1-4-1976, 24 to 30, 101, 107, 334, 1961, 43, 393, 398, 1961, 42, 1968, 68, 503, 508, 77, two, 82, 199, between th two, 52, 60).Muslim, 211

PERSON: Mohammedan, Rahim Khan, Abdul Karim Khan, Rahim Khan, Rahim Khan, Rahim Khan, Rahim Khan, Nos, Karim Khan, Mohammedan Law, B.R. Verma, p.236, Balaji v. ITO, Tulsidas Kilachandv, Sheth, Prem Bhai Parekh, Prem Bhai Parekh's, Sait, Zoonoo Bee, Jalal Din, Mohammedan Law, Mohammedan

ORG: New Bharat Hing Supply Co., Nadiad, Smt, ITO, Ayshabegam, AAC, ITO, AAC, AAC, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, inter alia, the Supreme Court, CIT, CIT, CIT, Taiyabji, SDA, ref, Taiyabji

NORP: Rahim, Sunni, Muslim, Mt. Begum, Muslim, Muslim, Muslim, Muslim, Muslim

GPE: Karim, Karim, invalid.6, case.10, Quran

DATE: 12-11-1966, 1972-73, 1961, the assessment year 1976-77, the assessment year 1972-73, 1975, 1972-73, those four years, 1982, four years, three years, 1976-77, 1977-78, 1980, 1970, 1853, 1917

ORDINAL: first, firstly, secondly, first, Fifth, Fifth

FAC: B.R. Verma

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //