Semantic Analysis by spaCy
income-tax Officer Vs. Abdulrahim Khan M. Pathan
Decided On : Aug-26-1983
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
LAW: Section 64(1)(ii, Section 2(15A, Section 147, Section 664(l)(z7, Section 2(15A, Section 64(1)(ii, Section 2(15A, Section 2(15A, Section 64, Section 64, Section 64, Section 64, Section 2(15A, Section 64, Section 64, Section 2(15A).We, Section 64, Section 2(15A, Section 64, Section 64, Section 64
CARDINAL: 1, seven, two, two, 22, two, two, 1-4-1976, 24 to 30, 101, 107, 334, 1961, 43, 393, 398, 1961, 42, 1968, 68, 503, 508, 77, two, 82, 199, between th two, 52, 60).Muslim, 211
PERSON: Mohammedan, Rahim Khan, Abdul Karim Khan, Rahim Khan, Rahim Khan, Rahim Khan, Rahim Khan, Nos, Karim Khan, Mohammedan Law, B.R. Verma, p.236, Balaji v. ITO, Tulsidas Kilachandv, Sheth, Prem Bhai Parekh, Prem Bhai Parekh's, Sait, Zoonoo Bee, Jalal Din, Mohammedan Law, Mohammedan
ORG: New Bharat Hing Supply Co., Nadiad, Smt, ITO, Ayshabegam, AAC, ITO, AAC, AAC, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, inter alia, the Supreme Court, CIT, CIT, CIT, Taiyabji, SDA, ref, Taiyabji
NORP: Rahim, Sunni, Muslim, Mt. Begum, Muslim, Muslim, Muslim, Muslim, Muslim
GPE: Karim, Karim, invalid.6, case.10, Quran
DATE: 12-11-1966, 1972-73, 1961, the assessment year 1976-77, the assessment year 1972-73, 1975, 1972-73, those four years, 1982, four years, three years, 1976-77, 1977-78, 1980, 1970, 1853, 1917
ORDINAL: first, firstly, secondly, first, Fifth, Fifth
FAC: B.R. Verma