Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

A.M. Sadick Vs. Wealth-tax Officer

Decided On : Apr-26-1983

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin

LAW: Section 3 of the Act, Rule 1, Section 2(13, Section 2(13

CARDINAL: 1, 30-10-1982, three, 2, 2, 5, three, 2, 4, 123, 558, 31 to 35, 28, 1954, 26

DATE: 1971-1972, 1972-73, 1973-74, 1974-75, 1957, the previous year, 'previous year', the previous year, the previous year, 1980, 1979, Rule 1(i, the previous year, Rule 1(i, 1974, years, 1961, the previous year, the assessment year, the previous year

ORG: the Commissioner (Appeals, WTO, Kaloor, Corporation, WTO, The Commissioner (Appeals, Kaloor, Haryana High Court, Tribunal, WTO, Tribunal, Haryana High Court, Haryana High Court, Court, Haryana High Court, the Greater Cochin Development Authority, Kaloor, The Supreme Court, Narain Swadeshi Wvg, CEPT, Haryana High Court, Tribunal, Para A of Part

PERSON: Para A, Schedule, asset):-, Venugopal C. Govind, CWT v. Hari Singh, Sara Varghese, Coch, Hari Singh, Sara Varghese

QUANTITY: 5.40 acres, one acre, 5.40 acres

FAC: Sivarama Menon Road, Kasba Station

MONEY: 56 cents

PRODUCT: Schedule, Para A, 765

NORP: Hindu, Hindu, Punjab, Punjab, Punjab, Punjab, Punjab

ORDINAL: Firstly

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //