Semantic Analysis by spaCy
A.M. Sadick Vs. Wealth-tax Officer
Decided On : Apr-26-1983
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin
LAW: Section 3 of the Act, Rule 1, Section 2(13, Section 2(13
CARDINAL: 1, 30-10-1982, three, 2, 2, 5, three, 2, 4, 123, 558, 31 to 35, 28, 1954, 26
DATE: 1971-1972, 1972-73, 1973-74, 1974-75, 1957, the previous year, 'previous year', the previous year, the previous year, 1980, 1979, Rule 1(i, the previous year, Rule 1(i, 1974, years, 1961, the previous year, the assessment year, the previous year
ORG: the Commissioner (Appeals, WTO, Kaloor, Corporation, WTO, The Commissioner (Appeals, Kaloor, Haryana High Court, Tribunal, WTO, Tribunal, Haryana High Court, Haryana High Court, Court, Haryana High Court, the Greater Cochin Development Authority, Kaloor, The Supreme Court, Narain Swadeshi Wvg, CEPT, Haryana High Court, Tribunal, Para A of Part
PERSON: Para A, Schedule, asset):-, Venugopal C. Govind, CWT v. Hari Singh, Sara Varghese, Coch, Hari Singh, Sara Varghese
QUANTITY: 5.40 acres, one acre, 5.40 acres
FAC: Sivarama Menon Road, Kasba Station
MONEY: 56 cents
PRODUCT: Schedule, Para A, 765
NORP: Hindu, Hindu, Punjab, Punjab, Punjab, Punjab, Punjab
ORDINAL: Firstly