Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Smt. Arundhati Balkrishna Vs. Wealth-tax Officer
Decided On : Oct-01-1981
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
LAW: the Ground No. 1, Section 264, Section 7(1, Section 7, Section 7(1, Section 46(2, Section 24(6, Section 24(5, Section 24(5, Section 46(2, Section 46(2, Section 24(6
CARDINAL: 1, 1., 2., 1B, 2, 1B, 124, 1B, 112, 117, 443, 118, 399, 817-18, two, 2, only one, 367
ORG: CIT (Appeals, WTO, CIT (Appeals, WTO, the Commissioner (Appeals, WTO, WTO, the Bombay High Court, Smt, the High Court, the Allahabad High Court, CWT, ITR, CWT, Tribunal, the Bombay High Court, CIT, Bombay State Transport Corporation, the Bombay High Court, Kusumben D. Mahadevia, WTO, Court, Clauses, WTO, Court, Tribunal, Court, WTO, The Allahabad High Court, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Court, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Allahabad, Allahabad High Court, Court, Court, the Bombay High Court, WTO, Clauses, Legislature, Tribunal, the Allahabad High Court, Bombay State Transport Corporation, Court, the Commissioner (Appeals
PERSON: Harivallabhdas Kalidas, Shri J.P. Shah, Kusumben D. Mahadevia v., Shri Kathuria, Sripat Singhania, Shri J.P. Shah, Act.4, Shri J. P. Shah, Balsbury, Shri J.P. Shah
DATE: 1961, 1958, 1980, 1978, 1979, 1979
FAC: Ground No
GPE: N.C., Clauses, Clause, Sripat Singhania's, Quinn, Clauses, Clause
NORP: Rules
LOC: Padampat Singhania
ORDINAL: second, first, Secondly
PRODUCT: Leathan