Controller of Estate Duty Vs. Mafalda Faria

Decided On : Sep-05-1981

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

LAW: Rule 31, the Estate Duty Act, Section 34(3, Section 34(3, Section 5(1, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 2, Section 34(3

CARDINAL: 1, two, one, 1, 1., 15, 16,200, 2, 31A, 49, 60,000.The, three, 6, 78, 3, 123, 60,000, 61,200, 60,000, 31A, 60.000, 30, 50, 30, 608, 73, 30, 1., 2., 3., 606, 50, two, 50, 30, 31, 31A, 31A, 49, 60,000, 34(3, 1, 2, 15, two, two, two, two, two, 88, two, 7,614, 17

ORG: Air India, Sections 5, CED, the Appellate Controller, Reliance, Smt, CED, AP, Appellate, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Appellate Controller, the Appellate Controller, the ex gratia payment.5, the Appellate Controller, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Indian Airlines Corporation, Corporation, Clauses 49, Lordships, Smt, the Appellate Controller, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Supreme Court, CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd., the Appellate Controller, the Married Women's Property, the Appellate Controller, Tribunal, ED Appeal No, ED Appeal No., Tribunal

PERSON: Establishment Order, Controller, A.T. Sahani, Lakshmisagar Reddy v., Shri M.M. Mazumdar, Lakshmisagar Reddy, Lakshmisagar Reddy, Shri Mazumdar, S.S. Inamdar, Shri Inamdar, Sahani, Shri M.M. Mazumdar, Sahani, Sahani, Lakshmisagar Reddy, Lakshmisagar Reddy, Lakshmisagar Reddy, Lakshmisagar Reddy, Lakshmisagar Reddy, Rs, Lakshmisagar Reddy, Lakshmisagar Reddy, inter se

WORK_OF_ART: Regulations

DATE: 1953, 1970, 1980, Rule 73, 31, 1973, 192.Hence, two years

GPE: Delhi, duty.6

ORDINAL: first, third, second, second, second, first, third, second, second, first, second, first, second

PRODUCT: Flight Engineers