Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Master Mahabir JaIn Vs. Wealth-tax Officer

Decided On : Apr-16-1981

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

LAW: section 25(2, Section 25(2, Section 25(2, Section 16(3, Section 25(2, Section 25(2, Section 25(2, Section 25(2

ORG: the Wealth Tax, WTO, WTO, WTO, WTO, WTO, de-novo, Reliance, CIT, Mukur Corporation, CIT, ITR, WTO, WTO, WTO, WTO, WTO

CARDINAL: three, 2, 30-3-1978, 20-2-1980, us.3, 16, 16, 1,65,000, 30,780, 2,69,328, 12, 22,444, 30,780, 22,444, 111, 312, 99, 375.5, 16, 9,711, 16, 2, 16, 16, 12

DATE: 1957, years 1974-75 to 1976-77.2, the years, 1974-75, 1975-, 1976-77 2,70,000, the assessment year 1974-75, the subsequent years, the assessment year 1974-75, the subsequent years, annual, annual, annual, 1978, 1975, year 1974-75, year 1974-75, 1,55,379, this year, years, annual, these two years

PERSON: C.S. Aggarwal, Addl, Gee Vee Enterprises

ORDINAL: Secondly

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //