Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Concordia Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax,

Decided On : Mar-31-1952

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin

LAW: Section 113(1, Section 66(1, Section 17, Section 13, the Indian Act, Section 13

GPE: Trivandrum, America, America, L.J.

WORK_OF_ART: the Travancore Income-tax Act

DATE: 1121, the year or, the year, February, 1944, The year, the first year, the year, the latter half of March, 1945, March 20, 1945, the end of the year, 14, the first year, The year, the first year, the first year, from day to day, 12 months, 1816, every day, every day of the year, the particular year, the next year or the year, another year, 1951, a year, the year, the year, the year, the year, annual, 1)(a, that year

NORP: Indian

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 2,000, 3, 953, 38, 56, 17,154, 2,000, two, 57, 56, one, 2,000, 2,000, 4, 2,000, 17, 15, 7, 1, 608, 15, 161, 166, one, 585, two, two, 100-101)."The, 10, 2)(a, 2)(c, 2)(d, 2, 1

ORG: Appellate, Tribunal, Appellate, Appellate, Quilon, Appellate, Appellate, Appellate, Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellate, Appellate, Appellate Tribunal, Appellate, it.5, Courts, Department, Department, Gresham Life Assurance Society v., the Master of the Rolls in Claytons, Appellate, Appellate Tribunal, Department, Department, Sampath Iyengars Commentary, The Spanish Prospecting Company Limited, Crown, Chari &, Tribunal

PERSON: George, George, George, Revised Report, Fletcher Moulton, Madras, Ram, T. V. Krishna Iyer v. C. S. Lakshmanan

ORDINAL: first, first, second, first, first, first, first, first, third, third, third

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //