V.M.C. Software Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jan-01-2003

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

LAW: the SEBI Act, Regulations 6, Regulations 6, Regulations 6 and 8, Chapter II, Section 24, Section 15A of the SEBI Act, Chapter VIA of the SEBI Act, the Takeover Regulations, the SEBI Act, the Takeover Regulations, the Takeover Regulations, Regulations 8(1, the Takeover Regulations, Regulations 8(1, the SEBI Act, the SEBI Act, Chapter II, the SEBI Act, the SEBI Act, Section 15, Section 15A(b, Section 15, the SEBI Act, the SEBI Act, Section 15, Section 15

CARDINAL: 1, three, two, 26-8-2002, 2, 27-8-2002, 1,50,000, 50,000, five, 82, three, three, 2, 15A(b, 6(4, 8(3, 1,50,000, 4, 6(3, 8(1, 8(2, 6(3, 8(2, 5, 6(4, 8(3, 6(3, 8(1, 1, 330, ten thousand, 8, just ten thousand, 4, three, 5,000, five thousand, one, 12, 1, 2, 6(3, 8(1, 8(2, 6(4, 8(3, 8(2, 3, 15, 16, 31-12-2002, 28, 31-3-2003.18, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, one, fifty thousand, 83/2002, fifty thousand, five, 82/2002, two, 5, ten thousand, 5, 83, 82, eighty thousand, ten thousand, 81, thirty thousand, 82/2002, eighty thousand

PRODUCT: Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

PERSON: Nos, Shri J. M. Thakur, Shri Sanjay Doshi, Shri Jayant M. Thakur, Sri Sat Ram, R. S. Joshi's, Shri Barua, Appellants, Shri Barua, Appellants, Shri Thakur, Regulations, Barua, Rai v. Raghunath Prasad, Nos

DATE: 82/2002, 1997, as early as 1996, 1999, 82/2002, Section 15J, 1970, 2002, 2002, 1977, Section 15J, each day of delay.6, 1997, 1997, 1992, every day, 2002, 1997, 1997, 1997, 1997, a particular year, that year, 8(2).14, 1997, para 5, 3 months, October 1, 2002, December 31, 2002, a period of, 4 months, October 1, 2002, January 31, 2003, 2003, 1997, 1997, 82 and 83, three weeks

ORG: 83/2002, Total Network Solutions Ltd., Total Networks Solutions Ltd., Appellants, Appellant, the Securities and Exchange Board of India, 83/2002, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Hindustan Steels Ltd., State, Orissa AIR, SC, Tribunal, Escort Mutual Fund, Appellants, Scheme, Appellants, the Hon'blc Supreme Court, Appellants, Appellants, Appellants, Appellants, Scheme, the Securities and Exchange Board, the Securities and Exchange Board of India, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Appellants, the Hon'ble Supreme Court's, Scheme, Tribunal, Scheme, Scheme, Appellants, Tribunal, Appellants' Counsel, Scheme, Scheme, Appellants, Scheme, 83/2002, Regulation 8(1).But, Scheme, 83/2002, Appellants

MONEY: 6(1, 6(1, 6(1

LOC: Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent

WORK_OF_ART: Scheme, Scheme, SEBI Regularization Scheme

NORP: Representative, R.

GPE: Clause

FAC: Clauses 2(b