Garden Silk Mills Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Decided On : May-15-1990

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

LAW: Rule 173Q, Section 11-A of the Act, Rule 53 of the Rules, Rule 173Q, Rule 173Q, Rule 173Q, Section 173Q(1

CARDINAL: 1, 1/75, 4, 173, 226, 7, 1/75, 4, 5,00,000/-, 2,95,140.53, two, 233, 2, 20, 4, 402, 26, 401, 39, 45, 29, 753.7, 53, 402, 209, 5,00,000/-, 50,000/-.16

DATE: 9-5-1989, 1944, 23-8-1984, 7,64,031.00, 1989, 44, 1978, 90 and 1979, 1986, 1989, 1987, daily, 1979

PERSON: Addl, Bonded Store Room, Appellants, Appellants, Surat, K.S. Nanavati, Nanavati, M.N. Desai, S. J. Panwala, Surat, Appellants, Nanavati, Nanavati, C.P. Arya, Arya, Salt Act, Appellants, Appellants, justified.15

ORG: Central Excise, the Central Excises, the Central Excise (Preventive, Appellants, Register, Baroda Collectorate vide, Show Cause, Appellants, Appellants, Show Cause Notice, the Excise Department, Surat, Appellants, Baroda Collectorate Notification, Appellants, Board, Board, the Collector of Central Excise, Appellants, Department, the Lot-Register, Department, Deptt, Appellants, Departmental, The Adjudicating Authority, the Bank Guarantee, Bank Guarantee, Appellants, Sarees and Dress Material, the Baroda Collectorate, Department, the Lot-Register, the Baroda Collectorate, the Lot-Register, ELT, Tri, ELT, ELT, the Adjudicating Authority, SDR, Tribunal, ELT, ELT, ELT, ELT, Appellants, the Central Excises &, Cellofane, the Baroda Collectorate, Andhra Pradesh High Court, Southern Steel Ltd., U.O.I., ELT, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Adjudicating Authority, the Show Cause Notice

NORP: Collec, Rules, B., Rules, Rules

PRODUCT: Rule 173Q of the Rules

GPE: Baroda, Ld, Ld, Ld, Bata v. C.C.E.

FAC: Superintendent