Semantic Analysis by spaCy
P.P. Products (P) Limited and ors. Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer and
Decided On : Feb-21-2003
Court : Sales Tax Tribunal STT Tamil Nadu
LAW: section 42, section 42, Section 42, section 42, Section 41, section 41, section 41, Constitution, section 41, section 42
CARDINAL: 1, 42(3, 42(5, 42(8, 1959.3, 95, 102, 167, 173, 3, 5, 8), 5, 5, 2, 3, 3, more than twenty-four hours, 6, three, 114, 121, 157, 102, 112, 113, 167, 173, two, two, 1, 3,70,000, 2,400, 1,720, 680, one, two, 102, 113, 114, 121, 165, 373, 13, 30, 6, 20, 41, 112, 113, 102
ORG: the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, Sales Tax Enforcement Wing, the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, Original Petitions Nos, the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, Learned Senior Counsel, the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, Government, State, Learned Advocate-General-Thiru N.R. Chandran, the Sales Tax Department, M/s. Haldia Petrochemicals Ltd., T. Nagar, Chennai-17.M/s. Tarajyot Polymers Ltd., M/s. P.P. Products, Learned Advocate-General, M/s. Tarajyot Polymers Ltd., Learned Advocate-General, Learned Senior Counsel, the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, Tvl, Impex Pvt Ltd., Karnataka State Co-operative Marketing Federation, Tvl, Impex Pvt. Ltd., Chennai, Tvl, the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, Haldia Petro, Calcutta, Chennai, the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, Lordships of the Supreme Court, State, Madras v. Davar and, Co. AIR, SC, Marine, Madras AIR 1986, the Supreme Court, State, State, Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., State of, Andhra Pradesh AIR 1996, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, State, State, the Government of India, the Government of India, the Central Sales Tax Act, State, Hyderabad, Central, the State of Andhra Pradesh, the Supreme Court of India, Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited v. Union, Kerala State Small Industries Development and Employment Corporation Ltd., AIR, the Supreme Court, Cochin, the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, Learned Advocate-General, Advocate-General the Statement of Objects, Learned Senior Counsel, AIR 1970 SC 165(Murugan, Nathan Trading Company, AIR 1990, Dabur India Ltd., State of Uttar Pradesh, the Supreme Court, Taxes, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, Tribunal, this Tribunal on the 21st day of
DATE: 1959, 1956, 2003, 2003, 2003, 2003, 1959, 1959, transit.-(1, 95, 2003, 2003, 2003, 1957, 200208716, 200208717, August 9, 2002, 1959, 1956, 2003, 1959, January 29, 2003, the earlier date, 5/2002-2003, January 29, 2003, 1959, 1959, 1959, 95, 2003, 1959, 1959, 1970, 1760, 1854, 2001, 1970, 1959, 1980, 1972, 1994, 1967, 1959, more than thirty days, ninety days, 42, 95, February, 2003
FAC: Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu State, the Tamil Nadu
GPE: Karnataka, West Bengal, O.P. Nos, O.P., O.P. Nos, Karnataka State, Chennai, Chennai, Karnataka, West Bengal, Kolkota, O.P. Nos, India, States, Kerala
TIME: under this Act, under this Act
PERSON: Bangalore, Bangalore, Bangalore, Bangalore, Bangalore, Nos, Jagroopjee Pukhraj, Bangalore, Tamil Nadu, Reasons, bailee, W.H. Deeth, Ramkishan Shrikishan Jhaver, Schedule, O.P. Nos
WORK_OF_ART: a Goods Detention Order, SC
LOC: Madras, Indian Ocean
PRODUCT: Co.
EVENT: SC 1814