Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Sundaram Industries Limited Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Decided On : Nov-12-1999

Court : Sales Tax Tribunal STT Tamil Nadu

LAW: the State Act, Section 3B of the Act, Article 466(29A, Constitution, Section 3B of the Act, Article 286 of the Constitution of India, Article 286, Constitution, Article 466, Section 3 of the Central Sales Tax Act, Section 4, Section 5, Section 2, Section 3 of the Central Sales Tax Act, the Constitution (Sixth Amendment) Act, the Indian Constitution, Article 286(2, Constitution, Constitution, Section 3-B of the Act, the CST Act, the TNGST Act, Article 466(29A)(b, Section 3B of the Act, Constitution, Section 3-B. Levy, Section 3, Section 7-A, Section 3, Section 3, Section 3-B of the Act, Section 3-B of the Act, Section 3-B, Article 286 of the Constitution of India, Section 3-B of the Act, Section 3-B of the Act, Article 466(29A)(b, Section 2(n, Section 2, Section 3 of the Central Sales Tax Act, Section 7-A of the Act, Section 7-A of the Act, Section 7-A. Levy, Section 3, Section 3 or 4, Section 3 or Section 4, Section 3 or, Section 7-A of the Act, Constitution, Section 3-B of the Act, Section 3

CARDINAL: 1, 17,57,615, 2, 73, 370, 54, 92A, 3, 5, 88, 204, 1, 54, 54, 286(2, 286(2, 269, 286, 54, 5, 15, 5, 4, 82, 90, 1, 90, 221, 1, 100, one, 3, 4, 90, 88, 204, 87, 196, 4, 205, one, 5, 6, 112, one, 1, 2, 3, 4, one, one, 7, 22, two, between two or more, one, one, 8, two, one, 73, 370, 107, 420, 366, one, 2-A, 3, 4, 7, 8), 1, 2, 2, more than one, 2, 3, 88, 289, 3, 5, 15, 88, 204, 88, 204, 11, 12, 533, 016, 2, 379, 451042/86, 1, 2., 3, 4, one, 82, 66/11, 90, 87, 196, one, 90, 1, 90, 221, 239, 73, 100, one, 3, 4, 90, 88, 204, 16, one, 100, 61, 73, 398, 1939, 272, 100, 1, 2, 88, 94, 477.In, 73, 370

DATE: today, January 10, 1991, 1959, 1989, 4, 1993, 54, 1956, Forty-sixth Amendment, 54, Forty-sixth Amendment, 4, 4, 54, 4, 1956, 1991, 1993, 1993, 1956, 1996, 1993, 1993, 1992, 1953, 1999, 1963, 1989, 1997, each year, the 26th day of June, 1986, June 26, 1986, 1993, 4, 1993, 1993, 30 days, November 28, 1987, 20-11-1989 Retd, 23-11-1989, 30 days, 1991, 1993, 1992, 1993, 1956, 1993, 1989, 1996, 1993, 1993, 1996, 1986, 1997, September 23, 1999, 1989, 1996, 1993, 1994, 1989, the 12th day of November, 1999

ORG: Tribunal, the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madurai, M.T.A. No, State, the State of Tamil Nadu, State, the Appellate Tribunal, the State of Tamil Nadu, the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, Appellate Tribunal, the State of Tamil Nadu, the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Builders Association of India v. Union of India, the Appellate Tribunal, State, Union List, Parliament, Parliament, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Supreme Court, Gannon Dunkerley &amp, Co., State, State, the State List, State, the State List, the State Legislature, State, State, State List, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, the State List, the Central Sales Tax Act, State, the State List, the Central Sales Tax Act, Sections 14, State List, State, the Central Sales Tax Act, Court, Sections 3 and 4 of the Central Sales Tax Act, the Gauhati High Court, Projects and Services Centre v. State of Tripura, the State of Tripura, State, Sugars Ltd., the Supreme Court, East India Cotton Manufacturing Company Limited v. State of, Haryana, the High Court, State, Thomson Press, State of, STC, Haryana High Court, State, the State Legislature, the State Legislature, the Supreme Court, Gannon Dunkerley &amp, Co., SC, Sales Tax, ex-U.P., State, State of Travancore-Cochin v., AIR 1972, AIR, State, Parliament, State, State, purchaser-State, State, State, Permanent Edition, State, Congress, State, State, State, State, the Appellate Tribunal, Government Advocate, the Appellate Tribunal, the State of Tamil Nadu, the Supreme Court, Builders Association of India v. Union of India, Hydrotec Engineers India Pvt. Ltd., State, the Appellate Tribunal, State, the First Schedule, Table, Toubro Limited, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Supreme Court, Gannon Dunkerley &amp, Co., the Supreme Court, Gannon Dunkerley &amp, Co., State, the Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Sundaram Industries Malanmallay Tea Estate,, Kochadai, TVS, SI Ltd., Madurai Address, Central RC No.104310/73-74TERMS, Government/Central or State/Local Authorities/Bodies, The Supreme Court, State, State, the State of Tamil Nadu, Projects and Services Centre v. State of Tripura, K.V. 6.3 MVA, State of, the Supreme Court, State, SC, Sales Tax, U.P., ex-U.P., State, East India Cotton Manufacturing Company Limited v. State of, State, Haryana High Court, East India Cotton Manufacturing Company Ltd., State of, SC, Thomson Press, State of, STC, State, the State Legislature, the State Legislature, the Supreme Court, Gannon Dunkerley &amp, Co., State, STC, Thomson Press, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Builders Association of India v. Union of India, M.R. Hornibrook (Pty) Ltd., Electricity Board, STC, Thomson Press, State, the Supreme Court, Hotel Balaji v. State of Andhra Pradesh, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Builders Association of India v. Union of India, State, the High Court, Tribunal, the Tamil Nadu Government, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, this Tribunal on

NORP: inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, Punjab, inter-State, inter-State, American, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, intra-State, Gauhati, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, Punjab

MONEY: 70 per cent, 5 per cent, 30 per cent, 18 per cent

ORDINAL: first, second, First

GPE: States, States, States, Act.3, Kerala, Kerala, India, States, States, States, Sections 3, Sections 3, States, Sections 3, the State of Tripura, the State of Tripura, Chittur, Kerala, the State of, the State of, Haryana, Rajasthan, Kerala, States, States, States, the United States, States, States, Kerala, Kerala, Kerala, Kerala, Kerala, India, India, Larsen, India, India, Rajasthan, Vandiperiyar, Kerala State, States, States, States, States, Sugars, Kerala, the State of, the State of, Haryana, Rajasthan, States, T.C.R., States, Kerala, Kerala, Kerala, Kerala, Kerala, Kerala

PERSON: N. Sriprakash, Tamil Nadu, Articles 269(3, Articles 269(3, Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu, Bakhtawar Lal Kailash Chand, Shanmugha Vilas Cashew-nut Factory, Gift Tax, Coromandal Fertilisers v. State of, Lal Mehta v., N. Sriprakash, K. Soundararajan, includes--, Tamil Nadu, Vandiperiyar, lorry, C.S. PrathapAddress, Order Ref, thro, Tamil Nadu, Bakhtawar Lal Kailash Chand Arhti, Haryana, Haryana, Tamil Nadu v., H. Anraj v. Government, either,--, A. Anthony Swamy v. State

PRODUCT: the Full Bench, the Full Bench

EVENT: SC 23

FAC: Tamil Nadu, Sections 14, Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu

WORK_OF_ART: the Constitution of India, Section 2(n, Section 2(n, Permanent Edition

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //