Jupiter Nevesh Private Limited Vs. Administrator of Specified

Decided On : Apr-19-2006

Court : DRAT Mumbai

LAW: Section 2(g, the RDDB Act, the RDDBFI Act, the RDB Act, Section 2(g, Section 2(g, the RDB Act, Section 2(g, the RDDBFI Act, Section 2(g, the RDDBFI Act, the RDB Act, BC 15, the RDB Act

CARDINAL: 1, 1 to 11, 21.7.1999, 12, 15, 21.7.1999, 1 to 11, 12, 12, 1 to 11, 12, 12, 15, 7,31,50,684.93, 22,31,50,684.93, 1 to 11, 12, 1, 11.3, 12, 1 to 11, 1 to 11, 1 to 11, 12, 12, 1 to 11, 12, 12, 12, 1 to 11, 12, 12, 12, 1 to 11, 12, 1, 11.8, 12, 22, 1 to 11, 1 to 11, 2002, 257

ORG: the Debts Recovery Tribunal, DRT, Tribunal, DRT, the Recovery of Debts Due to, DRT, DRT, Court, DRT, DRT, Court, DRT, DRT, DRT, the Civil Court, U.T.I, Bank, United Bank of India v., Bank, DRT, the Supreme Court, Bank, Bank, DRT, the United Bank's, DRT, G.V. Films Ltd., Unit Trust of India, DRT, UTI, the Division Bench, RDB, DRT, DRT, DRT, DRT

GPE: Mumbai

DATE: 1993, each financial year, 22,31,50,684.63, 1993, 1963, all those years, 2002

PERSON: Nos, Nos, Nos, Nos, Nos, Nos, Nos, Nos, Banks, Nos, Nos, Nos, Nos, Nos, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Nos, Anr

PERCENT: 16%, 16%, 16%, 16%

MONEY: 16 per cent

ORDINAL: firstly