Satish Kumar Agarwal Vs. Bank of India and ors.

Decided On : Jul-20-2004

Court : DRAT Allahabad

LAW: the RDDBFI Act, the Full Bench of, Section 73, the Evidence Act, Section 73, the Evidence Act, Section 73, the Evidence Act

CARDINAL: 1, 100 of 2000, 1, 29, 488.09, 2, 3, 2, 3 and 4, 1, 2, 4, 5, 100 of 2000, 4, 5, 4, three, 4, 5, One, three, two, 144, 1, 4, 2, 5, 1, three, three, one, 1872.6

PRODUCT: D.R.T., D.R.T., D.R.T., D.R.T., D.R.T.

GPE: Jabalpur, Shri A.D.Kulkarni, Jabalpur, Jabalpur, W.P, Jabalpur, Karnataka, Jabalpur

DATE: 22nd April, 1995, 13, 4, the Year 1999, 21st September, 1987, 14th August, 1989, 14th February, 1990, May, 1992, 6th January, 21st September, 1987, 21st September, 1987, 14th August, 1989, 14th February, 1990, May, 1992, 6th January, 1993, 20th January, 2004, 2004, February, 2004, 16th September, 2003, 1993, Rule 12(6, 1993, 2004, 1872, 1872, 1995, 1995, the year 2000

PERSON: Nos, Nos, Nos, Nos, Jabalpur, Nos, Nos, I.J. Wader, Nos, R-401/04, Debts Recovery, Ajit Savant Majagavi v. State, O. Bharathan v. K. Sudhakaran

ORG: Directors, Bank, Bank, Tribunal, Bank, Court, Bank, Bank, Bank, Bank, Bank, Tribunal, D.R.T., Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, Tribunal, Madhya Pradesh, the Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, Tribunal, Original, the three Bank officials.4, Bank, Lakhan Agarwal, Lakhan Agarwal, Tribunal, Bank, the Debts Recovery Tribunal, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, Union of India, Delhi High Court Bar Association II, Tribunal, Madhya Pradesh High Court, Kowa Spinning Ltd., BC 106 (FB, Bank, Counsel for the Bank, the Original Application, Bank, the Original Application, Tribunal, Tribunal, Bank, Court, Court, Court, High Courts, the Apex Court, Court, Court, Bank, Bank, Advocate of the Bank, Bank, Bank

ORDINAL: first, 9th, first

WORK_OF_ART: Satish Kumar Agarwal, Satish Kumar Agarwal