Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

S. Sethuraman Vs. Central Bank of India

Decided On : Apr-20-2004

Court : DRAT Madras

LAW: Section 13(4, the SRFAESI Act, Section 62, the Indian Contract Act, Section 63, the Indian Contract Act, Section 63, the Indian Contract Act, Section 7, the Indian Contract Act, Section 7 of the Contract Act.6

CARDINAL: 1, 1.5, 5.5, 1.5, 1.5, 25,000/-, 25,000/-, 5.25, 25,000/-, 1.5, one, 2.3.2005, 11, 1.5, 16.3.2005, 1.5, Fifteen, 5,000, 2,000, 5,000, 13, 20, 27, 20, 20, 20, 20, 1.5, 25,000/-, 2, 30, 99, 51, 30, 250

PERSON: Order, Mir Nawab, Mir Nawab, Jitendra Chandra Ray Chawdhary, Anr, S.N. Banerjee, Barrister, Mal Ram Nath v., Bhagat AIR, Mclea

ORG: SA No, Chennai, Chennai, Bank, Tribunal, DRT, Bank, Bank for One Time Settlement, OTS, OTS, Bank, Bank, OTS, OTS, DRT, DRT, Tribunal, Bank, OTS, Bank, Bank, Bank, OTS, Cheque, DRT, Order, Bank, Tribunal, OTS, Court, Bank, Advocate, One Time Settlement, OTS, OTS, Bank, OTS, Bank, DRT, DRT, OTS, Bank, Bank, OTS, Cheque, OTS, Berar, Hyderabad, The Trial Court, the Appellate Court, the Supreme Court, the Appellate Court, Bank, OTS, Bank, Tribunal, Bank, OTS, OTS, Circular, the Reserve Bank of India, RBI, Privy Council, Saraswat Trading Agency v., Union of India AIR 2002, D &, the Indian Courts, Berar, AIR 1963, SC, Emphasis

DATE: 2002, 6.2.2006, 10 days, 15 days, 11.2.2006, 20.3.2006, 20.3.2006, 24.3.2006, 22.5.2006, 20.3.2006, 20.3.2006, 6.2.2006, 1872, 20.3.2006, 1872, 1937, 1872, 20.3.2006, 1872, 1928

NORP: Cheque, Cheque, Cheque, Cheque, Cheque

PRODUCT: No-Lien, No-Lien, Calcutta 181

FAC: Lala Kapurchand Godha

ORDINAL: third, third

GPE: Lala Kapurchand Godha

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //