Skip to content

R.N. Hathiramani Vs. Canara Bank - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: May-07-2003

Court: DRAT Madras

LAW: Section 68, Section 42, Section 44, the FEMA Act, Section 30, the FERA Act, Section 21 of the Act

CARDINAL: 1, 26B.10, 6, 4, 2,250, 1, 1, 1, 1,00,00,000/-, one, seventy-five, 4.6.2003

ORG: NRI, Bank, the Reserve Bank of India, RBI, RBI, Bank, Bank, Bank, RBI, Bank, RBI, NRI, Bank, RBI, NRI, Company, Managing Partner, Bank, RBI, the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, Dank, Application, RBI, Bank, RBI, Application, the Foreign Exchange Management Act, the Central Government, the Reserve Bank, the Reserve Bank, Amendments, RBI, the Exchange Control Manual, the Reverse Bank, Bank, Banks, Bank, Bank, Bank, Bank, Non-Residents, the overseas party, the overseas Bank, the overseas party, Bank, Xerox, RBI, RBI, RBI, RBI, RBI, RBI, Board of the Company, Permission, RBI, RBI, Banks, Bank, Bank, RBI, Bank, RBI, Bank, PO, DRT, Bank, Bank, RBI, PO, DRT, PO, DRT, D3

ORDINAL: 1st, 2nd, 2nd, 1st, 3rd

DATE: 1973, 1973, 1987, 1973, 31.3.1987, four weeks

WORK_OF_ART: Edition, the Share Certificate

GPE: India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, OA

PERSON: Banks, Banks, R.N. Hathiramani, Order, D3

PERCENT: 75%

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //