Kanakeswar Choudhury Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Decided On : Sep-20-2004

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Guwahati

LAW: Rule 14, Rule 14, Section 6, Rule 14, Rule 14

CARDINAL: 1, 1.9.1999, 6.1.2000, 21.1.2000, 1.9.1999, 7.4.2000, 28.4.2000, 28.4.2000, 4.9.2000, 13.10.2000, 8.1.2001, two-thirds, 4.9.2000, 16, 14, 5, 9, 10, 2, 9, 10, 5, 17.8.1999, 1.9.1999, 6.1.2000, 21.1.2000, 7.4.2000, 28.4.2000, 28.4.2000, 6, 10, 21.1.2000, two-thirds, 26.4.2000, 28.4.2000, 21.1.2000, 28.4.2000, 28.4.2000, 1.9.1999, 21.1.2000, 4.9.2000, 21.1.2000, 28.4.2000, 2001(3, 296, 1999(1, 5)(a, one, 425, 3-b, 23, 14, 2002(1, 518, 5, 14, 586, 7, 128, one, 2, 306, 5, 10, 14, 5, 2, 21.1.2000, 1.9.1999, 28.4.2000, 28.4.2000, 193, 235, two-thirds

ORG: Education, the Central Board for Worker's Education, CBWE, Government of India, Ministry of Labour, Tinsukia, Selection Grade Education Officer, SG, SG, CCA, Conditions of Service, Tribunal, M.A. Siddiqui, M.A. Siddiqui, M.A. Siddiqui, the Disciplinary Authority, Appellate Authority, Learned Counsel, CCA, the Disciplinary Authority, an Inquiring Authority, Government, Disciplinary Authority, Government, the Inquiring Authority, the Inquiring Authority, Government, The Inquiring Authority, Government, Tinsukia, Tinsukia, Shri M.A. Siddiqui, the Inquiring Authority, 9 &amp, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Inquiry Committee, Board's Account, the Inquiring Authority, Inquiring Authority, Shri M.A. Siddiqui, the Inquiring Authority, dismissed.8, Learned Counsel, Union of India and Ors, ATJ, State of, Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1961, Tribunal, The Apex Court, Prasad, ATJ, Union of India, the Railway Servants (, Discipline &, the Inquiry Officer, Reliance, Air Force, ATJ, Singh v. Union of India and Ors, Tribunal, CCA, Tripura Road Transport Corporation and Ors, CCA, Government, Government, Division Bench, Assam State Agriculture Marketing Board, the Supreme Court, SC, the Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) Act, The Apex Court, the Apex Court, Apex Court, Learned Counsel, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Mahadeo Prasad, Regional Manager Food Corporation of India and Ors, M.A. Siddiqui, M.A. Siddiqui, Court, Learned Counsel, 9 &amp, the Disciplinary Authority, an Inquiring Authority, Government, Disciplinary Authority, M.A. Siddiqui, The Apex Court, Hyderabad, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, The Apex Court, the Inquiring Authority, M.A. Siddiqui, Apex Court, Central Bank of India, SC, the Disciplinary Authority, Appellate Authority, the Apex Court, B.C. Chaturvedi v. Union of India, AIR 1996, the Disciplinary Authority, the Appellate Authority, The High Court/Tribunal, the Disciplinary Authority, the Appellate Authority, the High Court/Tribunal, the Disciplinary/Appellate Authority

DATE: 1978, 1995, 17.8.1999, the year 1997-98, 1965, 1962, 15, 1965, Rule 15, 17.8.1999, the month of January, 1996, 1.9.1999, that day, 17.8.1990, April, 2000', 1.9.1999, 1968, Rule 15, 1965, 1999, 1975, Rule 15, 1993(3, 1996, Para 18

FAC: Tinsukia Centre, Tezpur Centre, the Enquiry Officer

PRODUCT: Para 2, Para 2, Rule 14, 6 SCC 415=1997(1

GPE: Centre, Counsel, C.G.S.C., Mam Chand, Bajoria, Mam Chand, Bajoria, Manindra, S.K., Singh

PERSON: P.K. Talukdar, P.K. Talukdar, M. Chanda, P.K. Talukdar, Rules 14, B.C. Pathak, Addl, Tinsukia Centre, P.K. Talukdar, P.K. Talukdar, T. Narayanan v., Wagon Works, Madras, K. Bhaskar v. The, Agartala Bench, Chandra Dhar v., Farhad Ali v. Secretary, Anr, P.K. Talukdar, P.K. Talukdar, P.K. Talukdar, B. Karunakar, P.K.Talukdar, Counsel

ORDINAL: second, Thirdly, first, first

TIME: enquiry minutes

WORK_OF_ART: Jagdish Prasad, Bangalore and Ors