Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Santosh Kumar Modi and ors. Vs. Sales Tax Officer and anr.

Decided On : Nov-06-2003

Court : Orissa

LAW: Rule 94, Section 16(1, Rule 94, Section 16-D of OST Act Rs, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 16-D of the Act, Section 16-B of the Act, Section 16-D of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, Section 16-D of the Act, Section 16-D of the Act, Section 16, Rule 94, Rule 94, Rule 94-A., Rule 94, Section 16-D of the Act, Rule 94, Section 16-D of the Act, Rule 94

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 2 to 9, 10, 10, 2,600.00Penalty, one, 6.0016, 100.00Entry, 20.00_______________Rs, 1,97,796.00_______________In, 1,30,000, 26,000, 100, 20, 1 to 9, 5, 4), twenty, 5, 5, 20, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 4), 1 to 9, 5, 5, 2003.8, 5, 5

PERSON: J.B. Sahoo, R.P. Kar, Nos, Talcher, Talcher, Orissa, Orissa, Sahoo, Nos, Kar, bailee, bailee, bailee, bailee, bailee, Nos

ORG: Additional Standing Counsel, the Sales Tax Department, the Orissa Sales Tax Rules, the Orissa Sales Tax Act, the Orissa Sales Tax Rules, Tax SC & PenaltyvaluedPer Pkt, the Sales Tax Officer, Additional Standing Counsel, the Orissa Sales Tax Rules, the Orissa Sales Tax Rules, the Orissa Sales Tax Rules

GPE: Angul, Kolkata, Angul

DATE: August 11, 2003, 1947, 1947, 1947, August 11, 2003, August 15, 2003, 1947, 1947, '94, at least 7 days, 1947, August 15, August 15, 2003, 1947, November 13, 2003

QUANTITY: 50,000 x 13=6,50,000OST, 13,000,00Double penalty Rs, 6 kg, 500.00 OST

PERCENT: 4%, 2%, 12%, 2%

ORDINAL: Second, second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //