Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Chinta Alias Prafulla Dehury Vs. State of Orissa

Decided On : Aug-14-2003

Court : Orissa

LAW: Section 302, Section 302, Section 302, Section 302

PERSON: Barman Roy, Phagala Bindhani, Kageswar, Anna, Phagala Bindhani, Maheswar, napkin, Gandhibudha, Suruja, Raghu, Jojodia, Anna, Anna, Chinta, Sasikanta Sahu @ Anna, Anna, Anna, Satyanarayan Ghose @ Kati Babu, Anna, Kumar Mohanty, K.M., lungi, lungi, L. Mohapatra, J.9

ORG: Chinta @ Prafulla Dehury, Balasore, IPC, Basta Police Station, Eiasta, Balasore, Panalal Jojodia, the T.V. Room, Gandiram, IPC, Court, Court, IPC, Court, Khageswar Das, Court, Balasore, Calcutta, Court, Court, Basta Police Station, Court, Court

WORK_OF_ART: 30.9.1994

CARDINAL: 13, 9.7.1993, 9.7.1993, 7.30, One, two, two, about 9, two, about 11, two, 7/8, twelve, twelve, 4, two, 2,3,11, 7, about 3.00, 9.7.93, 5, 6, about 2

DATE: 1994, 9.7.1993, the preceding two and half years, monthly, the last three preceding days, 4/6 earlier, 2 1, 22, that day

TIME: about 10 P.M., the morning, night, the morning, about half.an hour, five minutes later, Around 10/15 minutes later

GPE: F.I.R., Khageswar, Khageswar

PRODUCT: P.W. 1, Suruja

NORP: Indian, Narayan, P.Ws

FAC: Raghu

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //