Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ramaballav Khadanga Vs. Trinath Udgata and ors.

Decided On : Jun-18-2003

Court : Orissa

LAW: Section 439(2, Section 482, Section 4, the Dowry Prohibition Act, the Dowry Prohibition Act, Section 3 of the Act, Section 437

PERSON: A.S. Naidu, Berhampur, Berhampur Mahila P.S. Case, Kumar Udgata, Kumar Udgata, Berhampur, Berhampur, Berhampur, Misra, Addl, Nayak, Nayak, Nayak, Nayak, Berhampur

NORP: J.1

DATE: 1973, 2002, sixty-one years, sixty-seven years, twenty-four years

CARDINAL: 1 to 3, 594, 2002/159, 62, 2002.2, 498, one, 1, 3, 3, four, 1,00.000.00, one, 2.00.000.00, 2.00,000.00, 4,00,000.00, 1,00,000.00, 1 to 3, 1 to 3, 1 to 3, 1, 3, 1 to 3, 2, 1, 3, 1 to 3, 1 to 3, 1 to 3, 1, 1 to 3, 1 to 3, 1 to 3, 1, 3.8, 1, 3

ORG: Additional Sessions, Bail Application, FIR, Pradip, the Central Excise Department, FIR, FIR, FIR, Court, FIR, FIR, a Court of Session, Court, FIR, Court, Court, Court, Bail Application, Court, Court, FIR, Court, Central Government, FIR, FIR, FIR, FIR, FIR, Court, FIR, the State Counsel, FIR, Court, the Public Prosecutor, Case Diary, FIR, Court, Court, FIR

GPE: Pradip, Oriya

FAC: Second Addl

WORK_OF_ART: the Case Diary, the Case Diary

ORDINAL: 2nd

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //