Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Rama Chandra Ghanta Vs. State of Orissa

Decided On : Jun-17-2009

Court : Orissa

LAW: Section 325 I.P.C.

NORP: J.1

PRODUCT: Judgment, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

CARDINAL: 30.09.1988, 24/213, 1,000, one thousand, one, about 18, one, about 4, about 4.30, One, one, about 11.30, as many as twelve, two, 16, only one, 30.09.1988, 302/148/323/324/149, 3, 9, two to three, 3, 3, 2, 1/2', One, 1 1/2', 3, 2 1/2', 2, 1, 1'.(iii, 21, 9.7.1984, four, three to four, 10,000, ten thousand, 3

PERSON: Addl, Bhubaneswar, Taila, Satrughan, Appellant, The Learned Addl, Bhubaneswar, Braja Ghanta, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Singh, A.S. Naidu

GPE: S.T., Appellant, R.I.

DATE: 1985-84, three years, the year 1984, 6, 8, 20 years, about 2 months, about 2 months, the meantime 20 years, three) months

ORG: Appellant, Hari Ghanta, Gania Primary Health Centre, I.O., Appellant, Appellant, P.W.10, I.O., Gania P.S. Case No, Rajan Ghanta, Court, the Learned Counsel, Learned Additional Government Advocate, Court, Court

LOC: Rajan Nayak, the Appellant on Probation of Offenders Act

WORK_OF_ART: Appellant

PERCENT: 50 %

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //