Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Sri Sohar Ranjan Pattnaik Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Decided On : Nov-18-2005
Court : Orissa
LAW: Section 11(1, the Rule 102
PERSON: I.M. Quddusi, Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, Addl, Bhubaneswar, Gajendra Chatri, Bhubaneswar, Commandant, Addl, DIGP G.C. CRPF, Shri R. R. Sinha, Shri Sinha, Misc, Shri K. P.', Addl, P. VIII-3/2001-GCB-Estt-IIDated, Vill, Orissa, Enquiry Officer, Sd-Addl, Addl, Addl, DIGP GC CRPF Bhubaneswar, N. Prusty, J.13
NORP: J.1, Rules
ORG: COMNS, ADIGP, GC, CRPF, Constable/Radio Operator, DIGP, Force, Constable, C.R.P.F., R.R. Sinha, Constable' Gajendra Chatri, Court, OJC No, Court, 21.9.2001, the Disciplinary Authority, the C.R.P.F. Rules, Government of India, CCA, the C.R.P.F. Rules, DIGP, DIGP GROUP CENTRE CRPFBHUBANESWAR, ToNo, S.R. Pattnaik, CRPF Act & Rules, Departmental Enquiry, BhubaneswarTherefore, Force, the Government of India, Central Civil Services, Classification Control and Appeal) Rules, Government, Government, the C.R.P.F. Rules, the C.R.P.F. Rules, CCA, C.R.P.F. Rules and Rule 14, CCS, CCA, Force, the Government of India, CENTRAL CIVIL SERVICES, Government, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, Government, Government, the Inquiring Authority, Additional DIGP GC CRPF Bhubaneswar, CCA, inter alia, OJC No.12179, Court, DIGP, Court, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority
CARDINAL: 22.10.2002, one, 18.4.2000, 11.12.2000, 272, 9, 21.5,2002, 102, 891260932, 24.9.2001, 102, 6f, 8), 102, 8), 102, 22.10.2002
FAC: Lodhi Road, the Nayapalli P.S., the Enquiry Officer
GPE: New Delhi, G.C., G.C., P.S., CCS, KC, Balapara, CCS
DATE: 1949, 11.8.1999, 12.8.1998, 2000, 1999, Rule 27, 1955, October, 2001, 6th October 2001, 13.8.2001, 30.8.2001.2, 1965 14, 6th October 2001, 1995, 6th October 2001, 1999, 2 years, 30th August, 2001, October, 2001
PRODUCT: Shri Sinha, Shri Sinha, Rule-8, Rule 14 (8)(a
ORDINAL: 6th, 6th