Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Nilamadhab Nayak Vs. Lambodar Turuk and ors.
Decided On : Dec-13-2006
Court : Orissa
LAW: Lambodar Turuk.5, Section 392, Rule 29, Rule 28, Rule 25, Section 36(4
ORG: A.K. Ganguly, Lambodar, Lambodar Turuk, the District Magistrate/Collector, Court, Court, Lambodar Turuk, Lambodar Turuk, the Election Officer, Court, The Election Officer, Ward, the Orissa Municipal (Delimitation of Wards, Reservation of Seats, Lambodar, Court, Lambodar, Lambodar, the Supreme Court, Reliance, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Election Officer, Court, the District Magistrate/Collector, Lower Court
NORP: J.1, Electoral
DATE: 26th February, 2005, 2003, 15.11.2006, today, 1994, the last date, 1951
LOC: the District Judge, the District Judge
PERSON: Koraput, Umerkote, Umerkote, Nabarangpur, Lambodar Turuk, namely:(a, Rule, Rule, Rule, Election Officer, Tribes, Ext.1, Ext.1, Counsel, Ram Dayal v. Brijraj Singh, Ram Dayal, Lila Krishan v., Mani Ram Godara, Lila Krishan(supra, Krishna Mohini, Mahinder Nath Sofat, Paragraphs, Krishna Mohini, Koraput
CARDINAL: 1, one, 13, 2, 13, 2, two, two, 29(1, 1950.7, 29(1, one, one, one, one, 29(2, 16, more than two, 27, two, 1970]1SCR530, AIR1985SC1073, 42, 51
GPE: N.A.C., N.A.C.
WORK_OF_ART: the Scheduled Tribes or Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Castes, Caste/Tribe/Backward Class
ORDINAL: Second