Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Nilamadhab Nayak Vs. Lambodar Turuk and ors.

Decided On : Dec-13-2006

Court : Orissa

LAW: Lambodar Turuk.5, Section 392, Rule 29, Rule 28, Rule 25, Section 36(4

ORG: A.K. Ganguly, Lambodar, Lambodar Turuk, the District Magistrate/Collector, Court, Court, Lambodar Turuk, Lambodar Turuk, the Election Officer, Court, The Election Officer, Ward, the Orissa Municipal (Delimitation of Wards, Reservation of Seats, Lambodar, Court, Lambodar, Lambodar, the Supreme Court, Reliance, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Election Officer, Court, the District Magistrate/Collector, Lower Court

NORP: J.1, Electoral

DATE: 26th February, 2005, 2003, 15.11.2006, today, 1994, the last date, 1951

LOC: the District Judge, the District Judge

PERSON: Koraput, Umerkote, Umerkote, Nabarangpur, Lambodar Turuk, namely:(a, Rule, Rule, Rule, Election Officer, Tribes, Ext.1, Ext.1, Counsel, Ram Dayal v. Brijraj Singh, Ram Dayal, Lila Krishan v., Mani Ram Godara, Lila Krishan(supra, Krishna Mohini, Mahinder Nath Sofat, Paragraphs, Krishna Mohini, Koraput

CARDINAL: 1, one, 13, 2, 13, 2, two, two, 29(1, 1950.7, 29(1, one, one, one, one, 29(2, 16, more than two, 27, two, 1970]1SCR530, AIR1985SC1073, 42, 51

GPE: N.A.C., N.A.C.

WORK_OF_ART: the Scheduled Tribes or Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Castes, Caste/Tribe/Backward Class

ORDINAL: Second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //