Semantic Analysis by spaCy
In Re: Briggs of Burton (India) (P)
Decided On : Apr-04-2005
Court : Authority for Advance Rulings
LAW: Income Tax Act, section 2(22, Section 245Q(1, the IT Act, the Companies Act, Section 2(22, the IT Act, Section 2(22)(a, Section 80A, the Companies Act, Section 2(22, the IT Act, Section 2(22, the IT Act, Section 2(6A)(a
PERSON: Briggs, Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, K.D. Singh, A.S. Narang, Bangalore, Burton Plc, Giri Subramaniam 0.05, John Andrews, Briggs, Burton Plc, redemption.5, Hidayatullah J.
GPE: Burton, India, U.K., U.K.
DATE: 1961, 1922, 1956 - Section 80A, 1964, 1964, 1961, 27th Dec., 2004, 1956, 19990, March, 2005, 31st March, 2004, the next ten financial years, 1961, 1956, 1964, 1961, 1964, 1964, 1922
CARDINAL: 2(6A, 2(22, 245Q(1, 52, 54, 478, 34D, 2, 20, 100Mr, 10, 3, 34D, 80000, 100, 52, 54, 478, 52, 2(22)(b
ORG: CIT, Dalmia Investment Co, Ltd., SC, Sashibala Navnitlal, CIT, DEEMED, Authority, Briggs, Burton Plc England, General Reserve, The Supreme Court, CIT v. Dalmia Investment Co, Ltd., SC, Hon'ble Gujarat High Court, Sashibala Navnitlal v., CIT, CIT, Dalmia Investment Co. Ltd., SC, Hon'ble Supreme Court, CIT v. Dalmia Investment Co. Ltd
PERCENT: 99.95%, 100Total 100.00%
MONEY: 99.95 per cent, 99.95 per cent, 12 per cent
ORDINAL: 3rd
NORP: Hon'ble
WORK_OF_ART: The Indian IT Act