Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Satyanarayan Bhandar Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Decided On : Aug-23-2006

Court : Orissa

LAW: Section 12(4, the OST Act', Section 12(8, Section 5, the OST Act, Section 14, Section 14, the Sales Tax Act, Section 5(1, Section 5A(1)(a, Section 5(2, Section 42-B of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, Section 5, Section 3B, the Sales Tax Act, Section 14(i)(x

ORG: A.K. Ganguly, Court, Tribunal, SI, the Orissa Sales Tax Act, Sales Tax, OST, the State of Orissa, Sales Tax, ACST, the Sales Tax Officer, ACST, the Sales Tax Tribunal, The Sales Tax Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, the Orissa Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, Learned Counsel, Learned Counsel, Tribunal, Tribunal, Reliance, Food Corporation of India, District Office, Hubli/Raichur, STC, the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, the Food Corporation of India, FCI, FCI, M. N, STC, Learned Counsel, Sales Tax, Board of Revenue, Taxes, Pio Food Packers, SC, the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, Pio Food Packers, SC, Reliance, the Supreme Court, Alladi Venkateswarlu v. Government of Andhra Pradesh, the First Schedule, the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, the First Schedule, the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the High Court, Alladi Venkateswarlu, SC, the Calcutta High Court, Rasoi Products, Rasoi Products, Coffee Board, Court, Reliance, Sales Tax, Madhya Pradesh, the High Court, Grenfell, Legislature, Filterco, SC, Counsel for, petitioner.18, the Bombay High Court, Sales Tax v. Agarwal & Co., the High Court, the Bombay Sales Tax Act, Schedule A, The Bombay High Court, Agarwal & Co., Board of Revenue, Calcutta, STC, the Calcutta High Court, the Bengal Finance, Reliance, the Supreme Court, State of, SC, State, Sri Lakshmi Coconut Industries, Counsel for the Revenue, Rajasthan Roller Flour Mills Association, SC, the Central Sales Tax Act, Counsel for the Revenue, the Central Sales Tax Act.23, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court

NORP: J.1

CARDINAL: two, two, 33, 3., 29,138.88, 1,04,571.16, two, 1, 16, 52, 9, 10, 142, 229, 15, 6, 6, 11, 142, 229, 46, 46, 41, 394, 66, 397, 41, 394, 14, 51, 248, 51, 15, 80, 199, two, 16, 61, 318, 6, Twenty-six, 6, only five, twenty-six, twenty one, two, 1876, Two hundred, 1824, 430, 61, two, two, 61, 52, 117, 36, 52, 117, 20, 36, 2, 2, 2, 1, 21, 620, 141, 155, 14, 107, 566, 141, 155, 91, 1, 413, 91, 408, 1

PERSON: Robinson, pan masala, Robinson, Robinson, Robinson, Robinson, kutki.8, Robinson, Robinson, M. N. Nilugal v. District, Schedule, Robinson, Ernakulam, Robinson, Robinson, Robinson, Robinson, Robinson, Robinson, Robinson, Robinson, Ram Bhadur, Bangalore, Robinson, Robinson, Counsel, Filterco, Filterco, Robinson, Schedule, Robinson, Robinson, Robinson, Schedule, Schedule, Rajasthan Roller, Robinson, Robinson, Robinson, Robinson, I. Mohanty, J.24

DATE: June 30, 1990, 1947, the years 1990-91 and 1991-92, years, the years, 21987-CTA-98/90-F., June 30, 1990, 1947, 1990, January 9, 2002, 52, 1956, Section 14(i, 2005, 1957, 2005, 1980, 1963, 1980, 1978, 1957, 1978, 1982, 1982, 1991, 1986, 1958, 1958, 1986, 1986, 1983, 1959, 1983, 1975, 1941, 2003, January 27, 2003, 2005, March 22,1982, 1947, 14, 1997, 1997, 2005, 1993, 1994, 1993, 1994

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, second, first, first, first, first, first, first, first

PRODUCT: Act.4, Bench, Bench, Atlantis, 210, Bench, Bench, F, 11 SCC 621

MONEY: four per cent, 12 per cent, 12 per cent, four per cent, four per cent, 4 per cent, four per cent, four per cent, 10 per cent, four per cent

GPE: suan, kodon, with.10, Counsel, US, Filterco, East Limited, West Bengal, Modi Inds, Karnataka, Modi Inds, Rajasthan

FAC: Lordship

LANGUAGE: English

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //