Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Jr. Engineer/Manager, Nesco Ltd., Electrical Section and Two ors. Vs. Zarina Bibi and Four ors.

Decided On : Sep-08-2009

Court : Orissa

LAW: Section 10-A(2, Section 4-A(3, Section 10-A of the Act, Section 10-A, Section 10-A of the Act, Section 10-A of the Act, Section 10-A the Commissioner, Section 10-A of the Act, Section 10-A, Section 10-A of the Act, Rule 10, Section 10-A of the Act.10, Section 22, Section 10, Section 10-A, Section 22

PERSON: Patel, Cuttack, Nos

NORP: J.1, Muzubir Raheman

ORG: Learned Counsel, Workmen's Compensation-Cum-Assistant Labour, Notice, Court, ACJ 633, Orissa Workmen's Compensation Rules, the High Court

DATE: 28.07.2009, 46 years, monthly, thirty days, 1989, 1923, a period of, thirty days, today

CARDINAL: 211, 10,00,000/-, 3,32,580/-, 1 to 4, 2, 12, 28.08.2009, 2, 3, 4, 1, 4, 10, 1, II

EVENT: Workmen's Compensation Act, Form-II

MONEY: 50 per cent

GPE: A.D., Kamalakanta Pandey v. State

ORDINAL: first

PRODUCT: Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //