Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Smt. Sabitri Jagadev Vs. State of Orissa (Vigilance)
Decided On : Dec-03-2003
Court : Orissa
Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]Code Context$shops2 = $shops['topics'];$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/meta.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Smt. Sabitri Jagadev Vs. State of Orissa (Vigilance) Semantic Analysis', 'shops' => array( 'LAW' => array( (int) 0 => 'Section 13(1)(d', (int) 1 => 'Section 13(2', (int) 2 => 'Section 457', (int) 3 => 'Section 102 of the Cr.' ), 'NORP' => array( (int) 0 => 'J.1' ), 'ORG' => array( (int) 0 => 'This Criminal Revision', (int) 1 => 'the Court of the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate', (int) 2 => 'IPC', (int) 3 => 'the Prevention of Corruption Act', (int) 4 => 'Vigilance', (int) 5 => 'S.B. Account No', (int) 6 => 'Allahabad Bank', (int) 7 => 'Kalupada Ghat Branch', (int) 8 => 'S.B. Account', (int) 9 => 'Khurda Central Co-operative', (int) 10 => 'Bank', (int) 11 => 'inter alia', (int) 12 => 'L.J. 241', (int) 13 => 'Standing Counsel', (int) 14 => 'the Vigilance Department', (int) 15 => 'Court', (int) 16 => 'The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.', (int) 17 => 'The Criminal Revision' ), 'CARDINAL' => array( (int) 0 => '26.9.2003', (int) 1 => '29', (int) 2 => '29', (int) 3 => '120', (int) 4 => '2512/13', (int) 5 => '32', (int) 6 => '33', (int) 7 => '587' ), 'GPE' => array( (int) 0 => 'Vigilance G.R', (int) 1 => 'Vigilance', (int) 2 => 'P.C.', (int) 3 => 'Spl', (int) 4 => 'P.C.' ), 'DATE' => array( (int) 0 => '2003', (int) 1 => '2003', (int) 2 => '1988', (int) 3 => '31', (int) 4 => '1331', (int) 5 => '1988', (int) 6 => '1995', (int) 7 => '2003' ), 'PERSON' => array( (int) 0 => 'Bhubaneswar.2', (int) 1 => 'Tangi Branch', (int) 2 => 'C.J.M.', (int) 3 => 'Bhubaneswar', (int) 4 => 'Swaran Sabharwal', (int) 5 => 'Umashankar Rath', (int) 6 => 'L.J. 2779', (int) 7 => 'B. Ranganathan v. State', (int) 8 => 'Pradhan', (int) 9 => 'Mohapatra', (int) 10 => 'Asarathun Bibi' ) ), 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '533370', 'acts' => '<a href="/act/50902/code-of-criminal-procedure-1973-complete-act">Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973</a> - Sections 457', 'appealno' => 'Criminal Revisional Case No. 783 of 2003', 'appellant' => 'Smt. Sabitri Jagadev', 'authreffered' => '', 'casename' => 'Smt. Sabitri Jagadev Vs. State of Orissa (Vigilance)', 'casenote' => ' - LABOUR & SERVICES Pay Scale:[Tarun Chatterjee & R.M. Lodha,JJ] Fixation - Orissa Service Code (1939), Rule 74(b) Promotion - Government servant, by virtue of Rule 74(b), gets higher pay than what he was getting immediately before his promotion - Circular Dated 19.3.1983 modifying earlier Circular Dated 18.6.1982 resulting in reduction of pay of employee on promotion Held, It is not legal. Statutory Rules cannot be altered or amended by such Executive orders or Circulars or Instructions nor can they replace Statutory Rules. - State were cited on behalf of the petitioner to urge that seizure of such bank accounts as well as direction to stop their operation are illegal and, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => 'The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Asarathun Bibi and Ors. The Criminal Revision;', 'citingcases' => '', 'counselplain' => 'V. Narasingh, ;B.P. Pradhan and ;S. Das, Advs.', 'counseldef' => 'D.K. Mohapatra, Standing Counsel', 'court' => 'Orissa', 'court_type' => 'HC', 'decidedon' => '2003-12-03', 'deposition' => '', 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => 'Pradip Mohanty, J.', 'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">Pradip Mohanty, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. This Criminal Revision arises out of the order dated 26.9.2003 in Vigilance G.R, No. 29 of 2003 pending in the Court of the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate (Vigilance), Bhubaneswar.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. The petitioner's husband is arrayed as an accused in Vigilance G.R. No. 29 of 2003 registered under Sections 120-B/468/471/420 of the IPC and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. During the course of investigation in connection with the aforesaid case, the Vigilance investigating agency seized the bank accounts of the petitioner namely; S.B. Account No. 2512/13 of Allahabad Bank, Kalupada Ghat Branch; Current Account Nos. 31, 32 ad 33 and S.B. Account No. 1331 of Khurda Central Co-operative Bank, Tangi Branch. The petitioner, thereafter, filed an application under Section 457 of the Cr.P.C. for release of the aforesaid bank accounts in her favour. The said petition was considered by the learned Spl. C.J.M. (Vigilance), Bhubaneswar and rejected by. the impugned order, inter alia, on the ground that if at that stage the petitioner is allowed to operate the bank accounts, it will be suicidal for the investigating agency and it would be difficult to ascertain the truth.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">3. In course of argument, the provisions of Section 102 of the Cr.P.C. were referred to and the decisions reported in 1988 Crl. L.J. 241, Swaran Sabharwal v. Commissioner of Police; 1995 (II) OLR 587, Umashankar Rath v. Director General-cum-Inspector General of Police, Vigilance and 2003 Crl. L.J. 2779, B. Ranganathan v. State were cited on behalf of the petitioner to urge that seizure of such bank accounts as well as direction to stop their operation are illegal and, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">4. Having heard Mr. Pradhan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mohapatra, learned Standing Counsel for the Vigilance Department, this Court directs release of the aforesaid bank accounts in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner may operate the aforesaid bank accounts, but shall not withdraw the amounts those are lying in deposit therein til! the date of their seizure, which shall be kept in term deposits by the respective banks after obtaining signatures of the petitioner.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Asarathun Bibi and Ors. The Criminal Revision is accordingly disposed of.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => '', 'pubs' => 'II(2005)BC88; 97(2004)CLT90; 2004(I)OLR32', 'ratiodecidendi' => '', 'respondent' => 'State of Orissa (Vigilance)', 'sub' => 'Criminal', 'link' => null, 'circuit' => null ) ), 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '533370' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Smt. Sabitri Jagadev Vs. State of Orissa (Vigilance) Semantic Analysis' $shops = array( 'LAW' => array( (int) 0 => 'Section 13(1)(d', (int) 1 => 'Section 13(2', (int) 2 => 'Section 457', (int) 3 => 'Section 102 of the Cr.' ), 'NORP' => array( (int) 0 => 'J.1' ), 'ORG' => array( (int) 0 => 'This Criminal Revision', (int) 1 => 'the Court of the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate', (int) 2 => 'IPC', (int) 3 => 'the Prevention of Corruption Act', (int) 4 => 'Vigilance', (int) 5 => 'S.B. Account No', (int) 6 => 'Allahabad Bank', (int) 7 => 'Kalupada Ghat Branch', (int) 8 => 'S.B. Account', (int) 9 => 'Khurda Central Co-operative', (int) 10 => 'Bank', (int) 11 => 'inter alia', (int) 12 => 'L.J. 241', (int) 13 => 'Standing Counsel', (int) 14 => 'the Vigilance Department', (int) 15 => 'Court', (int) 16 => 'The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.', (int) 17 => 'The Criminal Revision' ), 'CARDINAL' => array( (int) 0 => '26.9.2003', (int) 1 => '29', (int) 2 => '29', (int) 3 => '120', (int) 4 => '2512/13', (int) 5 => '32', (int) 6 => '33', (int) 7 => '587' ), 'GPE' => array( (int) 0 => 'Vigilance G.R', (int) 1 => 'Vigilance', (int) 2 => 'P.C.', (int) 3 => 'Spl', (int) 4 => 'P.C.' ), 'DATE' => array( (int) 0 => '2003', (int) 1 => '2003', (int) 2 => '1988', (int) 3 => '31', (int) 4 => '1331', (int) 5 => '1988', (int) 6 => '1995', (int) 7 => '2003' ), 'PERSON' => array( (int) 0 => 'Bhubaneswar.2', (int) 1 => 'Tangi Branch', (int) 2 => 'C.J.M.', (int) 3 => 'Bhubaneswar', (int) 4 => 'Swaran Sabharwal', (int) 5 => 'Umashankar Rath', (int) 6 => 'L.J. 2779', (int) 7 => 'B. Ranganathan v. State', (int) 8 => 'Pradhan', (int) 9 => 'Mohapatra', (int) 10 => 'Asarathun Bibi' ) ) $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '533370', 'acts' => '<a href="/act/50902/code-of-criminal-procedure-1973-complete-act">Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973</a> - Sections 457', 'appealno' => 'Criminal Revisional Case No. 783 of 2003', 'appellant' => 'Smt. Sabitri Jagadev', 'authreffered' => '', 'casename' => 'Smt. Sabitri Jagadev Vs. State of Orissa (Vigilance)', 'casenote' => ' - LABOUR & SERVICES Pay Scale:[Tarun Chatterjee & R.M. Lodha,JJ] Fixation - Orissa Service Code (1939), Rule 74(b) Promotion - Government servant, by virtue of Rule 74(b), gets higher pay than what he was getting immediately before his promotion - Circular Dated 19.3.1983 modifying earlier Circular Dated 18.6.1982 resulting in reduction of pay of employee on promotion Held, It is not legal. Statutory Rules cannot be altered or amended by such Executive orders or Circulars or Instructions nor can they replace Statutory Rules. - State were cited on behalf of the petitioner to urge that seizure of such bank accounts as well as direction to stop their operation are illegal and, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => 'The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Asarathun Bibi and Ors. The Criminal Revision;', 'citingcases' => '', 'counselplain' => 'V. Narasingh, ;B.P. Pradhan and ;S. Das, Advs.', 'counseldef' => 'D.K. Mohapatra, Standing Counsel', 'court' => 'Orissa', 'court_type' => 'HC', 'decidedon' => '2003-12-03', 'deposition' => '', 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => 'Pradip Mohanty, J.', 'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">Pradip Mohanty, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. This Criminal Revision arises out of the order dated 26.9.2003 in Vigilance G.R, No. 29 of 2003 pending in the Court of the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate (Vigilance), Bhubaneswar.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. The petitioner's husband is arrayed as an accused in Vigilance G.R. No. 29 of 2003 registered under Sections 120-B/468/471/420 of the IPC and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. During the course of investigation in connection with the aforesaid case, the Vigilance investigating agency seized the bank accounts of the petitioner namely; S.B. Account No. 2512/13 of Allahabad Bank, Kalupada Ghat Branch; Current Account Nos. 31, 32 ad 33 and S.B. Account No. 1331 of Khurda Central Co-operative Bank, Tangi Branch. The petitioner, thereafter, filed an application under Section 457 of the Cr.P.C. for release of the aforesaid bank accounts in her favour. The said petition was considered by the learned Spl. C.J.M. (Vigilance), Bhubaneswar and rejected by. the impugned order, inter alia, on the ground that if at that stage the petitioner is allowed to operate the bank accounts, it will be suicidal for the investigating agency and it would be difficult to ascertain the truth.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">3. In course of argument, the provisions of Section 102 of the Cr.P.C. were referred to and the decisions reported in 1988 Crl. L.J. 241, Swaran Sabharwal v. Commissioner of Police; 1995 (II) OLR 587, Umashankar Rath v. Director General-cum-Inspector General of Police, Vigilance and 2003 Crl. L.J. 2779, B. Ranganathan v. State were cited on behalf of the petitioner to urge that seizure of such bank accounts as well as direction to stop their operation are illegal and, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">4. Having heard Mr. Pradhan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mohapatra, learned Standing Counsel for the Vigilance Department, this Court directs release of the aforesaid bank accounts in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner may operate the aforesaid bank accounts, but shall not withdraw the amounts those are lying in deposit therein til! the date of their seizure, which shall be kept in term deposits by the respective banks after obtaining signatures of the petitioner.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Asarathun Bibi and Ors. The Criminal Revision is accordingly disposed of.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => '', 'pubs' => 'II(2005)BC88; 97(2004)CLT90; 2004(I)OLR32', 'ratiodecidendi' => '', 'respondent' => 'State of Orissa (Vigilance)', 'sub' => 'Criminal', 'link' => null, 'circuit' => null ) ) $args = array( (int) 0 => '533370' ) $pattern = '/\(((0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])[.](0[1-9]|1[012])[.](17|18|19|20)[0-9]{2}).*\)/'include - APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]Code Context//$shops = $shops['entities'];foreach ($shops2 as $key => $val) {$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/meta.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Smt. Sabitri Jagadev Vs. State of Orissa (Vigilance) Semantic Analysis', 'shops' => array( 'LAW' => array( (int) 0 => 'Section 13(1)(d', (int) 1 => 'Section 13(2', (int) 2 => 'Section 457', (int) 3 => 'Section 102 of the Cr.' ), 'NORP' => array( (int) 0 => 'J.1' ), 'ORG' => array( (int) 0 => 'This Criminal Revision', (int) 1 => 'the Court of the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate', (int) 2 => 'IPC', (int) 3 => 'the Prevention of Corruption Act', (int) 4 => 'Vigilance', (int) 5 => 'S.B. Account No', (int) 6 => 'Allahabad Bank', (int) 7 => 'Kalupada Ghat Branch', (int) 8 => 'S.B. Account', (int) 9 => 'Khurda Central Co-operative', (int) 10 => 'Bank', (int) 11 => 'inter alia', (int) 12 => 'L.J. 241', (int) 13 => 'Standing Counsel', (int) 14 => 'the Vigilance Department', (int) 15 => 'Court', (int) 16 => 'The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.', (int) 17 => 'The Criminal Revision' ), 'CARDINAL' => array( (int) 0 => '26.9.2003', (int) 1 => '29', (int) 2 => '29', (int) 3 => '120', (int) 4 => '2512/13', (int) 5 => '32', (int) 6 => '33', (int) 7 => '587' ), 'GPE' => array( (int) 0 => 'Vigilance G.R', (int) 1 => 'Vigilance', (int) 2 => 'P.C.', (int) 3 => 'Spl', (int) 4 => 'P.C.' ), 'DATE' => array( (int) 0 => '2003', (int) 1 => '2003', (int) 2 => '1988', (int) 3 => '31', (int) 4 => '1331', (int) 5 => '1988', (int) 6 => '1995', (int) 7 => '2003' ), 'PERSON' => array( (int) 0 => 'Bhubaneswar.2', (int) 1 => 'Tangi Branch', (int) 2 => 'C.J.M.', (int) 3 => 'Bhubaneswar', (int) 4 => 'Swaran Sabharwal', (int) 5 => 'Umashankar Rath', (int) 6 => 'L.J. 2779', (int) 7 => 'B. Ranganathan v. State', (int) 8 => 'Pradhan', (int) 9 => 'Mohapatra', (int) 10 => 'Asarathun Bibi' ) ), 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '533370', 'acts' => '<a href="/act/50902/code-of-criminal-procedure-1973-complete-act">Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973</a> - Sections 457', 'appealno' => 'Criminal Revisional Case No. 783 of 2003', 'appellant' => 'Smt. Sabitri Jagadev', 'authreffered' => '', 'casename' => 'Smt. Sabitri Jagadev Vs. State of Orissa (Vigilance)', 'casenote' => ' - LABOUR & SERVICES Pay Scale:[Tarun Chatterjee & R.M. Lodha,JJ] Fixation - Orissa Service Code (1939), Rule 74(b) Promotion - Government servant, by virtue of Rule 74(b), gets higher pay than what he was getting immediately before his promotion - Circular Dated 19.3.1983 modifying earlier Circular Dated 18.6.1982 resulting in reduction of pay of employee on promotion Held, It is not legal. Statutory Rules cannot be altered or amended by such Executive orders or Circulars or Instructions nor can they replace Statutory Rules. - State were cited on behalf of the petitioner to urge that seizure of such bank accounts as well as direction to stop their operation are illegal and, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => 'The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Asarathun Bibi and Ors. The Criminal Revision;', 'citingcases' => '', 'counselplain' => 'V. Narasingh, ;B.P. Pradhan and ;S. Das, Advs.', 'counseldef' => 'D.K. Mohapatra, Standing Counsel', 'court' => 'Orissa', 'court_type' => 'HC', 'decidedon' => '2003-12-03', 'deposition' => '', 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => 'Pradip Mohanty, J.', 'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">Pradip Mohanty, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. This Criminal Revision arises out of the order dated 26.9.2003 in Vigilance G.R, No. 29 of 2003 pending in the Court of the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate (Vigilance), Bhubaneswar.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. The petitioner's husband is arrayed as an accused in Vigilance G.R. No. 29 of 2003 registered under Sections 120-B/468/471/420 of the IPC and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. During the course of investigation in connection with the aforesaid case, the Vigilance investigating agency seized the bank accounts of the petitioner namely; S.B. Account No. 2512/13 of Allahabad Bank, Kalupada Ghat Branch; Current Account Nos. 31, 32 ad 33 and S.B. Account No. 1331 of Khurda Central Co-operative Bank, Tangi Branch. The petitioner, thereafter, filed an application under Section 457 of the Cr.P.C. for release of the aforesaid bank accounts in her favour. The said petition was considered by the learned Spl. C.J.M. (Vigilance), Bhubaneswar and rejected by. the impugned order, inter alia, on the ground that if at that stage the petitioner is allowed to operate the bank accounts, it will be suicidal for the investigating agency and it would be difficult to ascertain the truth.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">3. In course of argument, the provisions of Section 102 of the Cr.P.C. were referred to and the decisions reported in 1988 Crl. L.J. 241, Swaran Sabharwal v. Commissioner of Police; 1995 (II) OLR 587, Umashankar Rath v. Director General-cum-Inspector General of Police, Vigilance and 2003 Crl. L.J. 2779, B. Ranganathan v. State were cited on behalf of the petitioner to urge that seizure of such bank accounts as well as direction to stop their operation are illegal and, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">4. Having heard Mr. Pradhan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mohapatra, learned Standing Counsel for the Vigilance Department, this Court directs release of the aforesaid bank accounts in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner may operate the aforesaid bank accounts, but shall not withdraw the amounts those are lying in deposit therein til! the date of their seizure, which shall be kept in term deposits by the respective banks after obtaining signatures of the petitioner.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Asarathun Bibi and Ors. The Criminal Revision is accordingly disposed of.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => '', 'pubs' => 'II(2005)BC88; 97(2004)CLT90; 2004(I)OLR32', 'ratiodecidendi' => '', 'respondent' => 'State of Orissa (Vigilance)', 'sub' => 'Criminal', 'link' => null, 'circuit' => null ) ), 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '533370' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Smt. Sabitri Jagadev Vs. State of Orissa (Vigilance) Semantic Analysis' $shops = array( 'LAW' => array( (int) 0 => 'Section 13(1)(d', (int) 1 => 'Section 13(2', (int) 2 => 'Section 457', (int) 3 => 'Section 102 of the Cr.' ), 'NORP' => array( (int) 0 => 'J.1' ), 'ORG' => array( (int) 0 => 'This Criminal Revision', (int) 1 => 'the Court of the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate', (int) 2 => 'IPC', (int) 3 => 'the Prevention of Corruption Act', (int) 4 => 'Vigilance', (int) 5 => 'S.B. Account No', (int) 6 => 'Allahabad Bank', (int) 7 => 'Kalupada Ghat Branch', (int) 8 => 'S.B. Account', (int) 9 => 'Khurda Central Co-operative', (int) 10 => 'Bank', (int) 11 => 'inter alia', (int) 12 => 'L.J. 241', (int) 13 => 'Standing Counsel', (int) 14 => 'the Vigilance Department', (int) 15 => 'Court', (int) 16 => 'The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.', (int) 17 => 'The Criminal Revision' ), 'CARDINAL' => array( (int) 0 => '26.9.2003', (int) 1 => '29', (int) 2 => '29', (int) 3 => '120', (int) 4 => '2512/13', (int) 5 => '32', (int) 6 => '33', (int) 7 => '587' ), 'GPE' => array( (int) 0 => 'Vigilance G.R', (int) 1 => 'Vigilance', (int) 2 => 'P.C.', (int) 3 => 'Spl', (int) 4 => 'P.C.' ), 'DATE' => array( (int) 0 => '2003', (int) 1 => '2003', (int) 2 => '1988', (int) 3 => '31', (int) 4 => '1331', (int) 5 => '1988', (int) 6 => '1995', (int) 7 => '2003' ), 'PERSON' => array( (int) 0 => 'Bhubaneswar.2', (int) 1 => 'Tangi Branch', (int) 2 => 'C.J.M.', (int) 3 => 'Bhubaneswar', (int) 4 => 'Swaran Sabharwal', (int) 5 => 'Umashankar Rath', (int) 6 => 'L.J. 2779', (int) 7 => 'B. Ranganathan v. State', (int) 8 => 'Pradhan', (int) 9 => 'Mohapatra', (int) 10 => 'Asarathun Bibi' ) ) $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '533370', 'acts' => '<a href="/act/50902/code-of-criminal-procedure-1973-complete-act">Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973</a> - Sections 457', 'appealno' => 'Criminal Revisional Case No. 783 of 2003', 'appellant' => 'Smt. Sabitri Jagadev', 'authreffered' => '', 'casename' => 'Smt. Sabitri Jagadev Vs. State of Orissa (Vigilance)', 'casenote' => ' - LABOUR & SERVICES Pay Scale:[Tarun Chatterjee & R.M. Lodha,JJ] Fixation - Orissa Service Code (1939), Rule 74(b) Promotion - Government servant, by virtue of Rule 74(b), gets higher pay than what he was getting immediately before his promotion - Circular Dated 19.3.1983 modifying earlier Circular Dated 18.6.1982 resulting in reduction of pay of employee on promotion Held, It is not legal. Statutory Rules cannot be altered or amended by such Executive orders or Circulars or Instructions nor can they replace Statutory Rules. - State were cited on behalf of the petitioner to urge that seizure of such bank accounts as well as direction to stop their operation are illegal and, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => 'The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Asarathun Bibi and Ors. The Criminal Revision;', 'citingcases' => '', 'counselplain' => 'V. Narasingh, ;B.P. Pradhan and ;S. Das, Advs.', 'counseldef' => 'D.K. Mohapatra, Standing Counsel', 'court' => 'Orissa', 'court_type' => 'HC', 'decidedon' => '2003-12-03', 'deposition' => '', 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => 'Pradip Mohanty, J.', 'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">Pradip Mohanty, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. This Criminal Revision arises out of the order dated 26.9.2003 in Vigilance G.R, No. 29 of 2003 pending in the Court of the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate (Vigilance), Bhubaneswar.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. The petitioner's husband is arrayed as an accused in Vigilance G.R. No. 29 of 2003 registered under Sections 120-B/468/471/420 of the IPC and Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. During the course of investigation in connection with the aforesaid case, the Vigilance investigating agency seized the bank accounts of the petitioner namely; S.B. Account No. 2512/13 of Allahabad Bank, Kalupada Ghat Branch; Current Account Nos. 31, 32 ad 33 and S.B. Account No. 1331 of Khurda Central Co-operative Bank, Tangi Branch. The petitioner, thereafter, filed an application under Section 457 of the Cr.P.C. for release of the aforesaid bank accounts in her favour. The said petition was considered by the learned Spl. C.J.M. (Vigilance), Bhubaneswar and rejected by. the impugned order, inter alia, on the ground that if at that stage the petitioner is allowed to operate the bank accounts, it will be suicidal for the investigating agency and it would be difficult to ascertain the truth.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">3. In course of argument, the provisions of Section 102 of the Cr.P.C. were referred to and the decisions reported in 1988 Crl. L.J. 241, Swaran Sabharwal v. Commissioner of Police; 1995 (II) OLR 587, Umashankar Rath v. Director General-cum-Inspector General of Police, Vigilance and 2003 Crl. L.J. 2779, B. Ranganathan v. State were cited on behalf of the petitioner to urge that seizure of such bank accounts as well as direction to stop their operation are illegal and, therefore, the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">4. Having heard Mr. Pradhan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mohapatra, learned Standing Counsel for the Vigilance Department, this Court directs release of the aforesaid bank accounts in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner may operate the aforesaid bank accounts, but shall not withdraw the amounts those are lying in deposit therein til! the date of their seizure, which shall be kept in term deposits by the respective banks after obtaining signatures of the petitioner.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Asarathun Bibi and Ors. The Criminal Revision is accordingly disposed of.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => '', 'pubs' => 'II(2005)BC88; 97(2004)CLT90; 2004(I)OLR32', 'ratiodecidendi' => '', 'respondent' => 'State of Orissa (Vigilance)', 'sub' => 'Criminal', 'link' => null, 'circuit' => null ) ) $args = array( (int) 0 => '533370' ) $pattern = '/\(((0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])[.](0[1-9]|1[012])[.](17|18|19|20)[0-9]{2}).*\)/' $shops2 = nullinclude - APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
LAW: Section 13(1)(d, Section 13(2, Section 457, Section 102 of the Cr.
NORP: J.1
ORG: This Criminal Revision, the Court of the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, IPC, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Vigilance, S.B. Account No, Allahabad Bank, Kalupada Ghat Branch, S.B. Account, Khurda Central Co-operative, Bank, inter alia, L.J. 241, Standing Counsel, the Vigilance Department, Court, The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., The Criminal Revision
CARDINAL: 26.9.2003, 29, 29, 120, 2512/13, 32, 33, 587
GPE: Vigilance G.R, Vigilance, P.C., Spl, P.C.
DATE: 2003, 2003, 1988, 31, 1331, 1988, 1995, 2003
PERSON: Bhubaneswar.2, Tangi Branch, C.J.M., Bhubaneswar, Swaran Sabharwal, Umashankar Rath, L.J. 2779, B. Ranganathan v. State, Pradhan, Mohapatra, Asarathun Bibi