Butu @ Madhua Oram Vs. State

Decided On : Aug-27-1985

Court : Orissa

LAW: Section 302, Section 324,I.P.C., Section 84, the Evidence Act, Section 84, Section 84, Section 6, Section 106, the Fndian Evidence Act, Section 106 of the Evidence Act, Section 84, Chapter IV, the Indian Penal Code, Section 84, the Indian Penal Code, Section 334, the Lunacy Act

PERSON: S.C. Mohapatra, J.1, K.C. Mohanti, I. P. C., Mirgamunda, P. W. 12, Koyili Dei, P. W. 12, P. W. 12, Abhimanyu, Tangia, P. W. 3, P. W. 10, P. W. 12, P. W. 10, Burla, P. W. 4, P. W. 12, P. W. 12, K. C. Mohanti, Mohanti, Charan Barik, Saraka Gundusa v. State, Shaukar Majhi, Sundar Majhi, Chandramohan Majhi, Khageswar Pujari v., Sec, I. P. C., Dot, A. I. R. 1964 S. C. 1563, Chhaganbhai Thakkar v. State, P. W. 12, Tirtha Oram, Paika, Dangar, P. W. 12, P. W. 7, Sankar Purohit, Mohanti, D. Pathak

ORG: The High Court Legal Aid and Advice Committee, Abhimanyu, Abhimanyu, Koyilt, Forensic Medicine, Sec, Court, ILR 1962 Cut, State, ILR, ILR, Paramananda Patra, State, State, CLT 322, State, CLT 232, Court, The State of Orissa, IPC, IPC, Court, Court, IPC, Court, the General Exception, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Abhimanyu, Judicial Magistrate, the Chief District Medical Officer, Court, the Chief District Medical Officer, Judicial Magistrate, State

DATE: 1860, 25.6. 1980, Next day, 1980, 1970, 1971, 53 (1982, two days, the day, 40 years, L912

NORP: Kolhapada

CARDINAL: about 1, one, 26, 9 and 11, 105, 408, 806, 930, 146, 37, 47(1979, 1984(1, 142, 84, 6, 9, one, 335

GPE: Tangia, Tangia, Koyili, Koyili, I.P.G, Renta, Orissa, Koyili

ORDINAL: first

FAC: Nitai Naik v. State

PRODUCT: Sakru Sa

LOC: Sadar