Maharashtra General Kamgar Union Vs. Hindustan Lever Ltd. and anr.

Decided On : Sep-19-1994

Court : Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

LAW: Section 12A, Section 10(a)(i, Section 37, Section 12A, the Companies Act, the Full Bench of the Commission, the Companies Act, Section 23, Section 23, the Companies Act, Section 23, the Companies Act, Section 20 to Section 26, Section 394(1)(iv, Chapter V of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices, Section 12A. There, Section 10(a)(i, Section 37(1, Section 12A, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Section 394A, the Division Bench, the Companies Act, Section 12A, Chapter V of the Companies Act, Section 12A, Section 392(1, the Companies Act, Section 23, the Amending Act, the Companies Act, Section 23, Section 20, the Amending Act, Section 23, Section 23, Chapter V of the Companies Act, the Companies Act, the Clayton Act, Section 12A, Section 10(a)(1, Section 37(1, Section 391, Chapter III, Chapter V of the Companies Act.34, Section 4(1, the Companies Act, Section 23, the Companies Act, Section 37(3, Chapter V of the Companies Act, Section 391, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Article 39, Section 55, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 391, the Companies Act, Section 37, the Companies Act, Section 27, Section 27A, Chapter VI, Chapter VI, Chapter VI of the Act, Section 2(o, Section 33, Section 37, Section 10(a)(i, Section 27 and/or 27A, Section 12A, Section 10(a)(i, Section 37

CARDINAL: 1, two, 5, two, two, 105, two, 391, 394, 68, 20 to 26, 27A, 391, 394, two, 391, 396, two, two, 1956.15, two, two, two, two, 2, 97.46, two, two, 391, 394, one, 2, 2).19, 1963.21, 391 to 394, two, 1, 23, two, 23, two, two, 100, two, 42, 5, 1(a, 4., two, two, four, 5, 31, 1, two, 391 to 394, 136, 3, two, one, two, 20 to 26, 2(o, 33(1, 37, two, 2(o, 33.46, 2(o, 33(1, 27A

ORG: the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Hindustan Lever Limited, HLL, Tata Oil Mills Co. Limited, HLL, TOMCO, HLL, Commission, Maharashtra General Kamgar Union, HLL, Chandra Pande, Commission, HLL, HLL, Unilever, HLL, the Supreme Court, Commission, HLL, TOMCO, Commission, HLL, The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Consumer Education, Commission, the Bombay High Court, HLL, Commission, the Bombay High Court, Commission, the Bombay High Court, Commission, Commission, Commission, TOMCO, Commission, Commission, Commission, Parliament, Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Parliament, Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Commission, Commission, Commission, the Central Government, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Bombay High Court, Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Bombay High Court, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court, TOMCO, HLL, Bombay High Court, the High Court, The Bombay High Court, the Central Government, HLL, the Bombay High Court, TOMCO, HLL, Commission, Bench, the Bombay High Court, HLL, Registrar, Commission, Tribunal, Commission, Commission, the Bombay High Court, Commission, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Central Government, Prior Government, Commission, Commission, the Bombay High Court, HLL, HLL, TOMCO, HLL, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Central Government, Commission, the Central Government, HLL, TOMCO, HLL, respondents.30, the Appellate Bench, the Bombay High Court, the Consumers Education Research Centre, CERC, HLL, HLL, CERC, the Appellate Bench, the Bombay High Court, HLL, HLL, HLL, HLL, HLL, HLL, CERC, the Central Consumer Protection Council, HLL, HLL, the Appellate Bench, the Bombay High Court, Commission, HLL, Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Reliance, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Legislature, Commission, the Central Government, Commission, Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Commission, the Directive Principles of State Policy, State, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, inter alia, Commission, the Supreme Court, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Supreme Court, the High Courts, Commission, the Central Government, Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Bombay High Court, Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act.40, Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Commission, the Government of India, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Statement of Objects, Commission, the Statement of Objects, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, HLL, TOMCO, Commission, Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Commission, Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices, the Bombay High Court, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Unilever, the Bombay High Court, the Supreme Court, Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act

PRODUCT: provisions.2

DATE: September 20, 1993, 1989-90, 1990-91, 1991-92, 1990, 89, 1991, September 27, 1991, 1991, March 9, 1993, March 19, 1993, March 19, 1993, March 29, 1993, August 3, 1993, June, 1993, June 29, 1993, June 30, 1993, September 20, 1993, September 21, 1993, March 9, 1993, more than six months later, 1991, 1991, 1991, 1991, 1991, September 28, 1993, '1, 1956, 1991, 1991, 1991, 1991, 1991, April 27, 1991, 1991, November 28, 1994

ORDINAL: first, second, third, fourth, First, second, second, first, first, Secondly, second

GPE: Bombay, Bombay, us, value.17, amalgamation.39, Reasons.42

PERSON: Sujata Gothoskar, Shri Desai, Shri Desai, Research Centre, T. T. K. Pharma Ltd., Shri F. S. Nariman, Shri O. P. Dua, Shri Nariman, Shri Nariman, Shri Nariman, Shri Desai, force,--, Shri Nariman, Shri Desai, Shri Dua, Shri Nariman, Shri Desai, Shri Desai, Reasons

WORK_OF_ART: Shri Harish, void.14

MONEY: 54.32 per cent, 83.38 per cent, 13.67 per cent, 17.09 per cent, 23.72 per cent, 99 per cent, 85 per cent, 99.97 per cent, 90 per cent

NORP: Indian, Indian, American

LOC: Chapter III