Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Land Acquisition Collector Vs. Smt. Sita Dei and Vice-chairman, C.D.A.
Decided On : May-03-2007
Court : Orissa
LAW: Order 27, Rule 8-A of the C.P.C., Order 41, Order 41, Rule 5, Order 41, Rule 1, Order 41, Order 27, Order 41, the Land Acquisition Act, the Order 27, Rule 8-A of the C.P.C., Section 54, the L.A. Act, the L.A. Act, Order 27, Rule 8-A, Order 27, Rule 8-A C.P.C., Order 41, Rule 7, Order 27, Section 54, the L.A. Act, the Order 27, Rule 8-A, Order 41, Rule 1, Rule 1, Rule 5, Order 41, Order 27, Rule 1, Rule 5, Order 41, Civil Procedure Amendment Act, Order 41, Order 27, Rule 8-A. Sub-rule, Rule 1, Rule 5, Order 41, Rule 5, Order 27, Order 41, Rule 5, Rule 1, Rule 5, the Rule 8-A of Order 27, Order 41, Rule 1, Order 41, Rule 5, Order 27, Rule 8-A, Rule 1, Order 27, Order 27, Order 27, Order 41, Rule 1(3, Order 27, Rule 8, Order 27, Land Acquisition Act, Section 53 of the Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, the L.A. Act, the L.A. Act, the L.A. Act, Chapter-V of the Land Acquisition Act, Order 27, Rule 8-A, Chapter-V of, the L.A. Act, Section 53 of the Act, the L.A. Act, Section 53 of the Act, Order 21, Rule 1, Section 34, Order 27, Rule 8-A of, Order 41, the L.A. Act, Section 53 of the Act, the L.A. Act, the Land Acquisition Act, Order 27, the L.A. Act
PERSON: Parichha, J.Misc, Case Nos, Prakash Bhawan, Ratan Lal, Spl, Bangalore, Orissa, Prem Nath Kapur v., Learned Addl, Charan Mohanty, Counsel, XX XX(5, Charan Mohanty, Anr, Prakash Bhawa, Das, Charan Mohanty's, Charan Mohanty's, Orissa, Ratan Lal, Counsel, Prem Nath Kapur, Gurpreet Singh, Cuttack, Misc
CARDINAL: 8 and 21, 1, 1{3, 5, 3, 5(5, 164, 69(1990, 637, four, 687.3, 2006)8SCC457, 1996)2SCC71 .4, 191, 3, 3, 8, 5, 6, 3, 5, 3, 5, 1, 3, 4, 8, 5, 6, 5, 3, 5, 3)(c, 3, 5, 3, 8, 5(5, 6, 28, 34, 49, half
ORG: Court, Bidanasi Triangular Development Project, the State Government, C.P.C, State, CPC, the State Government, the Development Authority, Court, Court, State, State, CLT 323, State, U.P., V.N. Enterprises, C.P.C, Counsel, Gurpreet Singh v. Union of India, National Fertilizers Corporation of India Ltd., CPC, the State Government, the State Government, Collector, Cuttack, State, State, the Appellate Court, Court, Appellate Court, XLI, Government, Government, the State Government, Court, CPC, Court, Collector, Cuttack, State, the State Government, State, Court, the State Government, the State Government, Court, Prativa Prakash Bhawan, Prativa Prakash Bhawan, the Division Bench, Court, the Central Government, Court, Government, State, U.P., State, Court, the State Government, Court, Court, the State Government, Court, Court, Court, Court, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, State, State, Court, Court, 1st Court
PERCENT: 50%, 50%, 50%, 50%, 50 %, 15% to 30%, 6% to 9%, 15%, 50%, 50%
DATE: the year 1983, 1990, 1995, 2004, 1980, 1976, paragraph-16, 28, excluded.10, Rule 5, 31, decades, the first year, subsequent years, 1983, 2004
GPE: C.P.C., Telecom, L.A., L.A., C.P.C., C.P.C., C.P.C., C.P.C., C.P.C.7, C.P.C., XX, C.P.C., C.P.C., Orissa, C.P.C., C.P.C., Padma, Padma, C.P.C., Telecom, C.P.C., C.P.C., C.P.C., C.P.C., C.P.C., C.P.C., L.A., C.P.C., L.A., C.P.C.
EVENT: L.A. Act, the L.A. Act.9, L.A. Act, L.A. Act
LOC: Single